FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of 14.64%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 36.22%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 1.21x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of -38.63%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 36.22%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Funko, Inc., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Funko, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tapestry, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of 16.12%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Tapestry, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.2%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 36.22%. On the other hand Tapestry, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $121.68 which suggests that it could grow by 8.72%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tapestry, Inc., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Tapestry, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tapestry, Inc. has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.208%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tapestry, Inc. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry, Inc. pays out 170.03% of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Tapestry, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is lower than Tapestry, Inc.'s net income of $274.8M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tapestry, Inc.'s PE ratio is 100.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 3.35x for Tapestry, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of -1.4%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Under Armour, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.57%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 36.22%. On the other hand Under Armour, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.87 which suggests that it could grow by 26.51%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Under Armour, Inc., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Under Armour, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour, Inc. has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.67%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Under Armour, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is higher than Under Armour, Inc.'s net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.39x for Under Armour, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.