FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.21%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.65%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.75 which suggests that it could grow by 45.34%. Given that Kontoor Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Funko, Inc., analysts believe Kontoor Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Funko, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.74%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontoor Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands, Inc. pays out 46.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Kontoor Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $853.1M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is lower than Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s net income of $36.9M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 1.23x for Kontoor Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of -1.57%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s return on equity of -54.79%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.65%. On the other hand Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.31%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.228%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. quarterly revenues of $934M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is higher than Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s net income of -$14.7M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.'s PE ratio is 100.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.54x for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of 2.52%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.65%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.43 which suggests that it could grow by 70.67%. Given that Peloton Interactive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Funko, Inc., analysts believe Peloton Interactive, Inc. is more attractive than Funko, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive, Inc. has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.98%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peloton Interactive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Peloton Interactive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $550.8M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is lower than Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Peloton Interactive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 1.01x for Peloton Interactive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Funko, Inc.'s net margin of 8.49%. Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9% beat Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26%.

Funko, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.65%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.41%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc..

Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, which suggesting that the stock is 41.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.52%.

Funko, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Funko, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues are $250.9M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $931M. Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M. Notably, Funko, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko, Inc. is 0.18x versus 1.32x for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.