FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of -2.1%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 88.14%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Jakks Pacific, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Jakks Pacific.

Funko has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.45%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $113.3M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 4.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.21x versus 0.31x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of 6.88%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Kontoor Brands's return on equity of 59.13%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could grow by 7.55%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Kontoor Brands, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Kontoor Brands.

Funko has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.48%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontoor Brands offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands pays out 45.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Kontoor Brands quarterly revenues of $622.9M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Kontoor Brands's net income of $42.9M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands's PE ratio is 16.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.21x versus 1.49x for Kontoor Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of -4.88%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.73 which suggests that it could grow by 37.4%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Mattel.

Funko has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.21x versus 1.08x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of -0.51% compared to Funko's net margin of 3.79%. Funko's return on equity of -6.35% beat Reynolds Consumer Products's return on equity of 16.17%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.1%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products.

Funko has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.097%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reynolds Consumer Products offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products pays out 54.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $293.7M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products quarterly revenues of $818M. Funko's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products's net income of $31M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reynolds Consumer Products's PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.21x versus 1.33x for Reynolds Consumer Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.