BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 6.69%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 17.91%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.52, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $112.88 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Crown Holdings, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Crown Holdings.

Ball has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.58%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Ball's net income of $179M is lower than Crown Holdings's net income of $193M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.26x versus 0.97x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -4.88%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.52, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.26x versus 1.09x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -43.95%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.52, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.06 which suggests that it could grow by 10.53%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Ball has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.26x versus 2.67x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 4.64%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $60.52, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.24 which suggests that it could grow by 11.45%. Given that Ball has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Ball is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Ball has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.256%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.58%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.26x versus 0.96x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.