BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of -1.11% compared to Ball's net margin of 12.33%. Ball's return on equity of 64.89% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.35%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $108.70 which suggests that it could grow by 21.77%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.354%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Ball's net income of -$32M is lower than Crown Holdings's net income of $358M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.11x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 25.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.36x versus 0.90x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a net margin of -1.11% compared to Ball's net margin of 6.09%. Ball's return on equity of 64.89% beat Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ball has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.35%. On the other hand Cooper-Standard Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.55%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.555, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.456%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Cooper-Standard Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues of $660.8M. Ball's net income of -$32M is lower than Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $40.2M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.11x while Cooper-Standard Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.36x versus 0.10x for Cooper-Standard Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.11% compared to Ball's net margin of --. Ball's return on equity of 64.89% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ball has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.35%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ball's net income of -$32M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.11x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.36x versus 126.55x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of -1.11% compared to Ball's net margin of 3.19%. Ball's return on equity of 64.89% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.15%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $62.15, signalling upside risk potential of 19.35%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $62.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.66%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.482%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Ball's net income of -$32M is lower than Silgan Holdings's net income of $45.1M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.11x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.36x versus 0.93x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.