LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Sportswear Co. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 5.51%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Columbia Sportswear Co.'s return on equity of 10.87%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.73%. On the other hand Columbia Sportswear Co. has an analysts' consensus of $57.57 which suggests that it could grow by 4.33%. Given that Lear Corp. has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear Co., analysts believe Lear Corp. is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear Co..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Sportswear Co. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.058%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Columbia Sportswear Co. offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear Co. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Columbia Sportswear Co. quarterly revenues of $943.2M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than Columbia Sportswear Co.'s net income of $52M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Columbia Sportswear Co.'s PE ratio is 16.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.26x versus 0.90x for Columbia Sportswear Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 14.64%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.73%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.17%. Given that Lear Corp. has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Lear Corp. is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.26x versus 1.23x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIKE, Inc. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 6.2%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat NIKE, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.08%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.73%. On the other hand NIKE, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.30 which suggests that it could grow by 26.89%. Given that NIKE, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe NIKE, Inc. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIKE, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.707%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. NIKE, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. NIKE, Inc. pays out 72.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than NIKE, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is lower than NIKE, Inc.'s net income of $727M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while NIKE, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.26x versus 2.09x for NIKE, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of -38.63%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.73%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 725.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.26x versus 0.43x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.