LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $119.55, signalling upside risk potential of 2.12%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 151.26%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.28x versus 81.41x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing Co. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 6.06%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Modine Manufacturing Co.'s return on equity of 19.86%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $119.55, signalling upside risk potential of 2.12%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing Co. has an analysts' consensus of $183.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.96%. Given that Modine Manufacturing Co. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe Modine Manufacturing Co. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing Co. has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.396%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Modine Manufacturing Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing Co. quarterly revenues of $738.9M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than Modine Manufacturing Co.'s net income of $44.8M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Modine Manufacturing Co.'s PE ratio is 39.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.28x versus 2.76x for Modine Manufacturing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 4.8%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.38%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $119.55, signalling upside risk potential of 2.12%. On the other hand Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.53%. Given that Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.159%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. pays out 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Douglas Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $162.1M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.28x versus 1.28x for Douglas Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

STRATTEC Security Corp. has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Lear Corp.'s net margin of 5.6%. Lear Corp.'s return on equity of 10.8% beat STRATTEC Security Corp.'s return on equity of 9.94%.

Lear Corp. has a consensus price target of $119.55, signalling upside risk potential of 2.12%. On the other hand STRATTEC Security Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $89.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.01%. Given that STRATTEC Security Corp. has higher upside potential than Lear Corp., analysts believe STRATTEC Security Corp. is more attractive than Lear Corp..

Lear Corp. has a beta of 1.333, which suggesting that the stock is 33.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STRATTEC Security Corp. has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.102%.

Lear Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. STRATTEC Security Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear Corp. pays 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. STRATTEC Security Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than STRATTEC Security Corp. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Lear Corp.'s net income of $126.4M is higher than STRATTEC Security Corp.'s net income of $8.5M. Notably, Lear Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.33x while STRATTEC Security Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear Corp. is 0.28x versus 0.57x for STRATTEC Security Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.