LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dana has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 1.06%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Dana's return on equity of -2.06%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $106.65, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 12.49%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Dana, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Dana.

Lear has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.354%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Dana offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Dana's net income of $25M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.22x versus 0.23x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 6.32%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $106.65, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than General Motors.

Lear has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Lear's net income of $80.7M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.22x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 1.02%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.22%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $106.65, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.25%. Given that Strattec Security has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Strattec Security is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.784%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.22x versus 0.29x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Lear's net margin of 6.96%. Lear's return on equity of 9.86% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $106.65, signalling upside risk potential of 17.72%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $92.31 which suggests that it could grow by 9.29%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Lear has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.396%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. Lear's net income of $80.7M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.22x versus 0.61x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.