VC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 4.47%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $36.69 which suggests that it could grow by 16.05%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.585%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $157M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 25.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.61x versus 0.50x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.16%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could fall by -2.49%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Visteon has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.867%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.61x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 6.32%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $54.39 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.127%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.61x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.45%. Visteon's return on equity of 23.53% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.31, signalling upside risk potential of 9.29%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $106.65 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.234, which suggesting that the stock is 23.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.537%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lear offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $934M, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Visteon's net income of $65M is lower than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.61x versus 0.22x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.