CPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Cooper-Standard Holdings's net margin of --. Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.92%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.708, which suggesting that the stock is 170.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues are $660.8M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $40.2M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Cooper-Standard Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cooper-Standard Holdings is 0.09x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Cooper-Standard Holdings's net margin of 16.19%. Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.88%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.92%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $31.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.56%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Gentex.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.708, which suggesting that the stock is 170.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.819%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentex offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues are $660.8M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $541.6M. Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $40.2M is lower than Gentex's net income of $87.7M. Notably, Cooper-Standard Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gentex's PE ratio is 13.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cooper-Standard Holdings is 0.09x versus 2.40x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Cooper-Standard Holdings's net margin of 1.54%. Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.92%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 24.09%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.708, which suggesting that the stock is 170.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.69%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues are $660.8M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $40.2M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Cooper-Standard Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 38.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cooper-Standard Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Cooper-Standard Holdings's net margin of -46.97%. Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.92%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 723.53%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Cooper-Standard Holdings, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Cooper-Standard Holdings.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.708, which suggesting that the stock is 170.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues are $660.8M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $40.2M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Cooper-Standard Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cooper-Standard Holdings is 0.09x versus 1.01x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.