SES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of -214.6% compared to SES AI's net margin of 10.01%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.61%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.58 which suggests that it could grow by 24.36%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.281%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. SES AI's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 8.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.62x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -214.6% compared to SES AI's net margin of -196.68%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.61%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.10 which suggests that it could grow by 490.91%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.58%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $22.5M. SES AI's net income of -$12.4M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 1.57x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -214.6% compared to SES AI's net margin of 4.75%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.61%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.56%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.565%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. SES AI's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 7.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.39x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -214.6% compared to SES AI's net margin of -132.43%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.61%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 266.06%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.5%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. SES AI's net income of -$12.4M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.98x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.