WKSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -98.3% compared to Worksport Ltd.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity of -95.2% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Worksport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 151.26%. Given that Worksport Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings Corp., analysts believe Worksport Ltd. is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings Corp..

Worksport Ltd. has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Worksport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Worksport Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Worksport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport Ltd. is 0.83x versus 81.41x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -98.3% compared to Worksport Ltd.'s net margin of -457.86%. Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity of -95.2% beat Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Worksport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7861.78%. Given that Luminar Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Worksport Ltd., analysts believe Luminar Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Worksport Ltd..

Worksport Ltd. has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.363%.

Worksport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18.7M. Worksport Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M is higher than Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$85.8M. Notably, Worksport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport Ltd. is 0.83x versus 0.12x for Luminar Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a net margin of -98.3% compared to Worksport Ltd.'s net margin of 1.73%. Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity of -95.2% beat Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38%.

Worksport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.36%. Given that Worksport Ltd. has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee), analysts believe Worksport Ltd. is more attractive than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee).

Worksport Ltd. has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.989%.

Worksport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Worksport Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays out 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worksport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues of $178.7M. Worksport Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M is lower than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M. Notably, Worksport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport Ltd. is 0.83x versus 0.52x for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI Corp. has a net margin of -98.3% compared to Worksport Ltd.'s net margin of -293.9%. Worksport Ltd.'s return on equity of -95.2% beat SES AI Corp.'s return on equity of -33.92%.

Worksport Ltd. has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling upside risk potential of 240.91%. On the other hand SES AI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that Worksport Ltd. has higher upside potential than SES AI Corp., analysts believe Worksport Ltd. is more attractive than SES AI Corp..

Worksport Ltd. has a beta of 0.307, which suggesting that the stock is 69.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Worksport Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport Ltd. quarterly revenues are $5M, which are smaller than SES AI Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. Worksport Ltd.'s net income of -$4.9M is higher than SES AI Corp.'s net income of -$20.9M. Notably, Worksport Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport Ltd. is 0.83x versus 35.66x for SES AI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.