Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
57
MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.85
Seasonality move
:
8.4%
Day range:
$37.79 - $38.92
52-week range:
$33.81 - $74.64
Dividend yield:
2.11%
P/E ratio:
14.57x
P/S ratio:
0.52x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
63.9K
Avg. volume:
78.6K
1-year change:
-49.08%
Market cap:
$432.7M
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.60
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)
|
$177.6M | $0.02 | -26.01% | -96.7% | $57.00 |
|
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Co.
|
$917.2M | $1.17 | -6.03% | -33.5% | $57.57 |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$961.5M | $2.36 | -7.44% | -70.13% | $89.50 |
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$233.3M | -$0.36 | -27.15% | -86% | $5.00 |
|
FWDI
AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd.
|
$4.3M | -$0.14 | 12.88% | -- | $3.75 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)
|
$37.85 | $57.00 | $432.7M | 14.57x | $0.20 | 2.11% | 0.52x |
|
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Co.
|
$54.51 | $57.57 | $2.9B | 16.40x | $0.30 | 2.2% | 0.88x |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$88.24 | $89.50 | $4.6B | 28.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.21x |
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$3.59 | $5.00 | $202.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
FWDI
AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd.
|
$0.46 | $3.75 | $16.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)
|
9.73% | 2.437 | 9.82% | 2.01x |
|
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Co.
|
22.48% | 0.875 | 16.99% | 1.44x |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
55.58% | -0.388 | 38.99% | 0.76x |
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
75.1% | 3.033 | 279.12% | 0.86x |
|
FWDI
AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd.
|
84.9% | -4.299 | 35.87% | 0.46x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MLR
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)
|
$25.3M | $4.1M | 6.41% | 7.38% | 2.29% | $18.1M |
|
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Co.
|
$468.5M | $87.6M | 8.58% | 10.87% | 9.29% | -$287.2M |
|
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
|
$583M | $207.7M | 5.33% | 10.98% | 20.84% | $226.2M |
|
FOSL
Fossil Group, Inc.
|
$132.4M | -$14.4M | -15.43% | -54.51% | -5.33% | -$22.5M |
|
FWDI
AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd.
|
$2.8M | -$1.1M | -271.06% | -1043.59% | -23.87% | -$7.4M |
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MLR or COLM?
Columbia Sportswear Co. has a net margin of 1.73% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net margin of 5.51%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38% beat Columbia Sportswear Co.'s return on equity of 10.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)14.18% $0.27 $466M COLMColumbia Sportswear Co.49.67% $0.95 $2.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MLR or COLM?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.6%. On the other hand Columbia Sportswear Co. has an analysts' consensus of $57.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.62%. Given that Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear Co., analysts believe Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)2 0 0 COLMColumbia Sportswear Co.2 5 1 -
Is MLR or COLM More Risky?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Sportswear Co. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.058%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLR or COLM?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Columbia Sportswear Co. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear Co. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLR or COLM?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than Columbia Sportswear Co. quarterly revenues of $943.2M. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M is lower than Columbia Sportswear Co.'s net income of $52M. Notably, Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Columbia Sportswear Co.'s PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is 0.52x versus 0.88x for Columbia Sportswear Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)0.52x 14.57x $178.7M $3.1M COLMColumbia Sportswear Co.0.88x 16.40x $943.2M $52M
-
Which has Higher Returns MLR or CROX?
Crocs, Inc. has a net margin of 1.73% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net margin of 14.64%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38% beat Crocs, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)14.18% $0.27 $466M CROXCrocs, Inc.58.52% $2.70 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MLR or CROX?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.6%. On the other hand Crocs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $89.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1.43%. Given that Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has higher upside potential than Crocs, Inc., analysts believe Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is more attractive than Crocs, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)2 0 0 CROXCrocs, Inc.4 8 1 -
Is MLR or CROX More Risky?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs, Inc. has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.972%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLR or CROX?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Crocs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLR or CROX?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than Crocs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $996.3M. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M is lower than Crocs, Inc.'s net income of $145.8M. Notably, Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Crocs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is 0.52x versus 1.21x for Crocs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)0.52x 14.57x $178.7M $3.1M CROXCrocs, Inc.1.21x 28.77x $996.3M $145.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns MLR or FOSL?
Fossil Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.73% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net margin of -14.82%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38% beat Fossil Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)14.18% $0.27 $466M FOSLFossil Group, Inc.49.01% -$0.76 $435.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MLR or FOSL?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.6%. On the other hand Fossil Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.28%. Given that Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, Inc., analysts believe Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is more attractive than Fossil Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)2 0 0 FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MLR or FOSL More Risky?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fossil Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.412%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLR or FOSL?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Fossil Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Fossil Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLR or FOSL?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are smaller than Fossil Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $270.2M. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M is higher than Fossil Group, Inc.'s net income of -$40M. Notably, Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Fossil Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is 0.52x versus 0.18x for Fossil Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)0.52x 14.57x $178.7M $3.1M FOSLFossil Group, Inc.0.18x -- $270.2M -$40M
-
Which has Higher Returns MLR or FWDI?
AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF has a net margin of 1.73% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net margin of --. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38% beat AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)14.18% $0.27 $466M FWDIAdvisorShares Madrona International ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MLR or FWDI?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.6%. On the other hand AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has higher upside potential than AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF, analysts believe Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is more attractive than AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)2 0 0 FWDIAdvisorShares Madrona International ETF0 0 0 -
Is MLR or FWDI More Risky?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLR or FWDI?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLR or FWDI?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are larger than AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M is higher than AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is 0.52x versus -- for AdvisorShares Madrona International ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)0.52x 14.57x $178.7M $3.1M FWDIAdvisorShares Madrona International ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MLR or PMNT?
Perfect Moment Ltd. has a net margin of 1.73% compared to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net margin of -38.63%. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s return on equity of 7.38% beat Perfect Moment Ltd.'s return on equity of -1043.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)14.18% $0.27 $466M PMNTPerfect Moment Ltd.58.66% -$0.06 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MLR or PMNT?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.6%. On the other hand Perfect Moment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 713.45%. Given that Perfect Moment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee), analysts believe Perfect Moment Ltd. is more attractive than Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)2 0 0 PMNTPerfect Moment Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is MLR or PMNT More Risky?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.989% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MLR or PMNT?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Perfect Moment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) pays 13.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MLR or PMNT?
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) quarterly revenues are $178.7M, which are larger than Perfect Moment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s net income of $3.1M is higher than Perfect Moment Ltd.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.57x while Perfect Moment Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) is 0.52x versus 0.44x for Perfect Moment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MLRMiller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee)0.52x 14.57x $178.7M $3.1M PMNTPerfect Moment Ltd.0.44x -- $4.8M -$1.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
44
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
