MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.12x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.58x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -793.92%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 463.91%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.3%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.12x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.58x versus 2.11x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 142.01%. Given that SES AI has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe SES AI is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.12x while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.58x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -132.43%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.37%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.733% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.973%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.12x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.58x versus 3.12x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.