MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of 1.54%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 25.98%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.69%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 38.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of 3.51%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 63.72%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.502%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are smaller than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $970.4M. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is lower than MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 0.38x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -46.97%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 579.61%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 1.22x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.