SB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diana Shipping has a net margin of 27.08% compared to Safe Bulkers's net margin of 17.06%. Safe Bulkers's return on equity of 12.04% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity of 2.56%.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 46.55%. On the other hand Diana Shipping has an analysts' consensus of $2.60 which suggests that it could grow by 81.82%. Given that Diana Shipping has higher upside potential than Safe Bulkers, analysts believe Diana Shipping is more attractive than Safe Bulkers.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.997%.

Safe Bulkers has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Diana Shipping offers a yield of 11.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Safe Bulkers pays 30.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Diana Shipping pays out 272.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe Bulkers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Diana Shipping's is not.

Safe Bulkers quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are larger than Diana Shipping quarterly revenues of $57.1M. Safe Bulkers's net income of $19.4M is higher than Diana Shipping's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Safe Bulkers's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Diana Shipping's PE ratio is 160.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe Bulkers is 1.22x versus 0.75x for Diana Shipping. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 27.08% compared to Safe Bulkers's net margin of 12.78%. Safe Bulkers's return on equity of 12.04% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 8.28%.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 46.55%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $19.84 which suggests that it could grow by 50.44%. Given that Genco Shipping & Trading has higher upside potential than Safe Bulkers, analysts believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more attractive than Safe Bulkers.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.483%.

Safe Bulkers has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 11.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Safe Bulkers pays 30.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 88.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe Bulkers quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Safe Bulkers's net income of $19.4M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Safe Bulkers's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 7.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe Bulkers is 1.22x versus 1.36x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 27.08% compared to Safe Bulkers's net margin of 5.73%. Safe Bulkers's return on equity of 12.04% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3%.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 46.55%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 118.22%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Safe Bulkers, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Safe Bulkers.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.203%.

Safe Bulkers has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Safe Bulkers pays 30.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe Bulkers quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $147.2M. Safe Bulkers's net income of $19.4M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Safe Bulkers's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe Bulkers is 1.22x versus 0.37x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 27.08% compared to Safe Bulkers's net margin of 13.74%. Safe Bulkers's return on equity of 12.04% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $5.10, signalling upside risk potential of 46.55%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $22.24 which suggests that it could grow by 56.18%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than Safe Bulkers, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than Safe Bulkers.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.531% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.126%.

Safe Bulkers has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 15.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Safe Bulkers pays 30.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe Bulkers quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Safe Bulkers's net income of $19.4M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Safe Bulkers's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe Bulkers is 1.22x versus 1.22x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.