CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 45.76%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 105.88%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.516, which suggesting that the stock is 48.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.09%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Euroseas offers a yield of 7.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 1.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.47x versus 0.89x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Heidmar Maritime Holdings's return on equity of --.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Heidmar Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher upside potential than Heidmar Maritime Holdings, analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more attractive than Heidmar Maritime Holdings.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.516, which suggesting that the stock is 48.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Heidmar Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidmar Maritime Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Heidmar Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Heidmar Maritime Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Heidmar Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.47x versus 2.47x for Heidmar Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navios Maritime Partners LP has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 28.68%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Navios Maritime Partners LP's return on equity of 14.25%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Navios Maritime Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $73.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.41%. Given that Navios Maritime Partners LP has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Navios Maritime Partners LP is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.516, which suggesting that the stock is 48.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navios Maritime Partners LP has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.075%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Navios Maritime Partners LP offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners LP pays out 1.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are smaller than Navios Maritime Partners LP quarterly revenues of $340.8M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Navios Maritime Partners LP's net income of $97.8M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Navios Maritime Partners LP's PE ratio is 2.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.47x versus 0.71x for Navios Maritime Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 97.28% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net margin of 15.93%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62% beat Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 17.23%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.34%. On the other hand Seanergy Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 133.46%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.516, which suggesting that the stock is 48.363% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.139, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.088%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 12.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays out 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues are $105.1M, which are larger than Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of $41.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M is higher than Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $6.6M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Seanergy Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 2.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers is 2.47x versus 0.61x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.