CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eurodry Ltd. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of -3.49%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Eurodry Ltd.'s return on equity of -10.4%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Eurodry Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.08%. Given that Eurodry Ltd. has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp., analysts believe Eurodry Ltd. is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp..

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eurodry Ltd. has a beta of 0.817, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.306%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Eurodry Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Eurodry Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are larger than Eurodry Ltd. quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is higher than Eurodry Ltd.'s net income of -$502.4K. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.21x while Eurodry Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 2.93x versus 0.76x for Eurodry Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Euroseas Ltd. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 52.18%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Euroseas Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.56%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Euroseas Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $74.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.52%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Euroseas Ltd., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Euroseas Ltd..

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.595%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Euroseas Ltd. offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas Ltd. pays out 14.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are larger than Euroseas Ltd. quarterly revenues of $56.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is lower than Euroseas Ltd.'s net income of $29.7M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.21x while Euroseas Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 2.93x versus 1.95x for Euroseas Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 49.32%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Global Ship Lease, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.88%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.175%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Global Ship Lease, Inc. offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are smaller than Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues of $192.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is lower than Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.21x while Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 2.93x versus 1.71x for Global Ship Lease, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 7.02%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 2.51%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.60, signalling upside risk potential of 22.72%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.61%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers Corp., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers Corp..

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.876%.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. pays out 89.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues of $263.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s net income of $18.5M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.21x while Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s PE ratio is 38.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 2.93x versus 2.26x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.