Financhill
Buy
62

CCEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.57
Seasonality move :
-2.27%
Day range:
$21.36 - $22.32
52-week range:
$14.09 - $24.83
Dividend yield:
2.76%
P/E ratio:
5.44x
P/S ratio:
3.06x
P/B ratio:
0.88x
Volume:
9.3K
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
13.5%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$369.4M
EPS (TTM):
$4.00

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
$104.2M $0.44 -3.55% -69.89% $25.80
DAC
Danaos Corp.
$253M $6.46 -2.01% 37.31% $98.00
EDRY
Eurodry Ltd.
$18.1M $0.96 24.46% -88.33% $20.00
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
$57.8M $4.47 8.48% 28.08% $71.67
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
$188.4M $2.31 3.27% -9.2% $37.00
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
$250M $0.61 -5.63% 8635.9% $25.43
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
$21.78 $25.80 $1.3B 5.44x $0.15 2.76% 3.06x
DAC
Danaos Corp.
$103.81 $98.00 $1.9B 4.14x $0.90 3.32% 1.88x
EDRY
Eurodry Ltd.
$14.28 $20.00 $40.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.79x
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
$56.52 $71.67 $396M 3.26x $0.70 4.56% 1.76x
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
$37.99 $37.00 $1.4B 3.41x $0.63 5.59% 1.79x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
$23.11 $25.43 $2.6B 44.02x $0.11 1.3% 2.56x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
62.36% 1.017 182.27% 1.03x
DAC
Danaos Corp.
16.86% 0.288 45.76% 3.96x
EDRY
Eurodry Ltd.
51.93% 1.121 218.69% 0.70x
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
34.16% 0.953 53.21% 2.57x
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
29.7% 0.827 66.05% 2.01x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
33.75% 0.835 58% 1.42x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
$53.6M $50M 2.66% 7.59% 50.26% $16.7M
DAC
Danaos Corp.
$142.6M $130.1M 10.96% 13.27% 49.88% $80M
EDRY
Eurodry Ltd.
$2.9M $1.1M -5.27% -10.4% 7.43% $4.9M
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
$35.7M $32.5M 19.95% 31.56% 57.12% $14.6M
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
$103M $99.2M 17.82% 26.12% 51.5% $109.2M
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
$64.1M $38.5M 1.6% 2.51% 14.58% $85.5M

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or DAC?

    Danaos Corp. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 50.11%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Danaos Corp.'s return on equity of 13.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    53.87% $0.40 $3.9B
    DAC
    Danaos Corp.
    54.71% $7.11 $4.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or DAC?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Danaos Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $98.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.6%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Danaos Corp., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Danaos Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3 1 0
    DAC
    Danaos Corp.
    0 1 0
  • Is CCEC or DAC More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danaos Corp. has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.019%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or DAC?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Danaos Corp. offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Danaos Corp. pays out 12.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or DAC?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are smaller than Danaos Corp. quarterly revenues of $260.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is lower than Danaos Corp.'s net income of $130.6M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.44x while Danaos Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 3.06x versus 1.88x for Danaos Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3.06x 5.44x $99.5M $23.1M
    DAC
    Danaos Corp.
    1.88x 4.14x $260.7M $130.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or EDRY?

    Eurodry Ltd. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of -3.49%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Eurodry Ltd.'s return on equity of -10.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    53.87% $0.40 $3.9B
    EDRY
    Eurodry Ltd.
    20.28% -$0.24 $196.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or EDRY?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Eurodry Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.56%. Given that Eurodry Ltd. has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp., analysts believe Eurodry Ltd. is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3 1 0
    EDRY
    Eurodry Ltd.
    1 1 0
  • Is CCEC or EDRY More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eurodry Ltd. has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.203%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or EDRY?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Eurodry Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Eurodry Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or EDRY?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are larger than Eurodry Ltd. quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is higher than Eurodry Ltd.'s net income of -$502.4K. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.44x while Eurodry Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 3.06x versus 0.79x for Eurodry Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3.06x 5.44x $99.5M $23.1M
    EDRY
    Eurodry Ltd.
    0.79x -- $14.4M -$502.4K
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or ESEA?

    Euroseas Ltd. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 52.18%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Euroseas Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    53.87% $0.40 $3.9B
    ESEA
    Euroseas Ltd.
    62.77% $4.25 $650.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Euroseas Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $71.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.8%. Given that Euroseas Ltd. has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp., analysts believe Euroseas Ltd. is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3 1 0
    ESEA
    Euroseas Ltd.
    2 0 0
  • Is CCEC or ESEA More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas Ltd. has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.93%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Euroseas Ltd. offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas Ltd. pays out 14.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or ESEA?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are larger than Euroseas Ltd. quarterly revenues of $56.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is lower than Euroseas Ltd.'s net income of $29.7M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.44x while Euroseas Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 3.06x versus 1.76x for Euroseas Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3.06x 5.44x $99.5M $23.1M
    ESEA
    Euroseas Ltd.
    1.76x 3.26x $56.9M $29.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or GSL?

    Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 49.32%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    53.87% $0.40 $3.9B
    GSL
    Global Ship Lease, Inc.
    53.44% $2.59 $2.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or GSL?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Global Ship Lease, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.61%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3 1 0
    GSL
    Global Ship Lease, Inc.
    1 1 0
  • Is CCEC or GSL More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.672%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or GSL?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Global Ship Lease, Inc. offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or GSL?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are smaller than Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues of $192.7M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is lower than Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.44x while Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 3.06x versus 1.79x for Global Ship Lease, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3.06x 5.44x $99.5M $23.1M
    GSL
    Global Ship Lease, Inc.
    1.79x 3.41x $192.7M $95M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCEC or SBLK?

    Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net margin of 7.02%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 7.59% beat Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 2.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    53.87% $0.40 $3.9B
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
    24.3% $0.16 $3.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $25.43 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers Corp., analysts believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3 1 0
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
    2 1 0
  • Is CCEC or SBLK More Risky?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.622% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.797%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. pays out 89.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCEC or SBLK?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues are $99.5M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues of $263.9M. Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s net income of $23.1M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s net income of $18.5M. Notably, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.44x while Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is 3.06x versus 2.56x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
    3.06x 5.44x $99.5M $23.1M
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
    2.56x 44.02x $263.9M $18.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?

Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Alerts

Sell
49
HYMC alert for Feb 3

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is up 19.68% over the past day.

Buy
67
FBRX alert for Feb 3

Forte Biosciences, Inc. [FBRX] is down 0.2% over the past day.

Buy
72
BNR alert for Feb 3

Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 15.43% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock