DSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 45.76%. Diana Shipping's return on equity of 2.56% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

Diana Shipping has a consensus price target of $2.60, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 82.71%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Diana Shipping, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Diana Shipping.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.09%.

Diana Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.9%. Euroseas offers a yield of 6.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Diana Shipping pays 272.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Diana Shipping's is not.

Diana Shipping quarterly revenues are $57.1M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Diana Shipping's net income of $9.7M is lower than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Diana Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.28x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 1.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diana Shipping is 0.81x versus 1.01x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of --. Diana Shipping's return on equity of 2.56% beat Heidmar Maritime Holdings's return on equity of --.

Diana Shipping has a consensus price target of $2.60, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Heidmar Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Diana Shipping has higher upside potential than Heidmar Maritime Holdings, analysts believe Diana Shipping is more attractive than Heidmar Maritime Holdings.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidmar Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Diana Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.9%. Heidmar Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diana Shipping pays 272.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidmar Maritime Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diana Shipping quarterly revenues are $57.1M, which are larger than Heidmar Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Diana Shipping's net income of $9.7M is higher than Heidmar Maritime Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Diana Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.28x while Heidmar Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diana Shipping is 0.81x versus 2.47x for Heidmar Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 5.73%. Diana Shipping's return on equity of 2.56% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 7.3%.

Diana Shipping has a consensus price target of $2.60, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 97.13%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Diana Shipping, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Diana Shipping.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.203%.

Diana Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.9%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 8.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Diana Shipping pays 272.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Diana Shipping's is not.

Diana Shipping quarterly revenues are $57.1M, which are smaller than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $147.2M. Diana Shipping's net income of $9.7M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Diana Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.28x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 7.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diana Shipping is 0.81x versus 0.41x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 17.06% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 13.74%. Diana Shipping's return on equity of 2.56% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

Diana Shipping has a consensus price target of $2.60, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $22.24 which suggests that it could grow by 42.93%. Given that Diana Shipping has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers, analysts believe Diana Shipping is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.820, which suggesting that the stock is 17.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.789, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.126%.

Diana Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.9%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 13.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Diana Shipping pays 272.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Diana Shipping's is not.

Diana Shipping quarterly revenues are $57.1M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Diana Shipping's net income of $9.7M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Diana Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.28x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diana Shipping is 0.81x versus 1.33x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.