SHIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 45.76%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.61%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 52.33%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Euroseas, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Euroseas.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.207, which suggesting that the stock is 79.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.024%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.46%. Euroseas offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.7M, which are smaller than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $6.6M is lower than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.63x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.66x versus 1.16x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

StealthGas has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 32.67%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat StealthGas's return on equity of 11.84%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.61%. On the other hand StealthGas has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 85.19%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than StealthGas, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than StealthGas.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.207, which suggesting that the stock is 79.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison StealthGas has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.8%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.46%. StealthGas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. StealthGas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.7M, which are smaller than StealthGas quarterly revenues of $43.5M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $6.6M is lower than StealthGas's net income of $14.2M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.63x while StealthGas's PE ratio is 2.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.66x versus 1.14x for StealthGas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globus Maritime has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of -23%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Globus Maritime's return on equity of 0.24%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.61%. On the other hand Globus Maritime has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 266.94%. Given that Globus Maritime has higher upside potential than Seanergy Maritime Holdings, analysts believe Globus Maritime is more attractive than Seanergy Maritime Holdings.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.207, which suggesting that the stock is 79.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globus Maritime has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.887%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.46%. Globus Maritime offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Globus Maritime pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.7M, which are larger than Globus Maritime quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $6.6M is higher than Globus Maritime's net income of -$2M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.63x while Globus Maritime's PE ratio is 54.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.66x versus 0.64x for Globus Maritime. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 15.93% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net margin of 13.74%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 116.61%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.82%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.207, which suggesting that the stock is 79.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.393%.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.46%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 13.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays 24.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.7M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $6.6M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Seanergy Maritime Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.63x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seanergy Maritime Holdings is 0.66x versus 1.31x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.