GSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas Ltd. has a net margin of 49.32% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 52.18%. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12% beat Euroseas Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.56%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.88%. On the other hand Euroseas Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $74.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.52%. Given that Euroseas Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe Euroseas Ltd. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas Ltd. has a beta of 0.794, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.595%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Euroseas Ltd. offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas Ltd. pays out 14.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are larger than Euroseas Ltd. quarterly revenues of $56.9M. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M is higher than Euroseas Ltd.'s net income of $29.7M. Notably, Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.26x while Euroseas Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease, Inc. is 1.71x versus 1.95x for Euroseas Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a net margin of 49.32% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 7.02%. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12% beat Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s return on equity of 2.51%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.88%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers Corp. has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.876%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. pays out 89.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers Corp. quarterly revenues of $263.9M. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M is higher than Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s net income of $18.5M. Notably, Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.26x while Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease, Inc. is 1.71x versus 2.27x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 49.32% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 26.48%. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12% beat Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 5.77%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.88%. On the other hand Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.3%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.689%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. pays out 26.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are larger than Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $47M. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M is higher than Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.4M. Notably, Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.26x while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease, Inc. is 1.71x versus 1.46x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Maritime Corp. has a net margin of 49.32% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net margin of 9.72%. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.12% beat United Maritime Corp.'s return on equity of -7.12%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.88%. On the other hand United Maritime Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 104.68%. Given that United Maritime Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, Inc., analysts believe United Maritime Corp. is more attractive than Global Ship Lease, Inc..

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Maritime Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.86%. United Maritime Corp. offers a yield of 11.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Global Ship Lease, Inc. pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. United Maritime Corp. pays out 78.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. quarterly revenues are $192.7M, which are larger than United Maritime Corp. quarterly revenues of $11M. Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s net income of $95M is higher than United Maritime Corp.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Global Ship Lease, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.26x while United Maritime Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease, Inc. is 1.71x versus 0.36x for United Maritime Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.