RKT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

loanDepot, Inc. has a net margin of -6.92% compared to Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net margin of -2.89%. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1% beat loanDepot, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.13%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.56%. On the other hand loanDepot, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.38 which suggests that it could grow by 16.26%. Given that Rocket Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than loanDepot, Inc., analysts believe Rocket Cos., Inc. is more attractive than loanDepot, Inc..

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison loanDepot, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. loanDepot, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. loanDepot, Inc. pays out 1.61% of its earnings as a dividend. loanDepot, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than loanDepot, Inc. quarterly revenues of $302M. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M is lower than loanDepot, Inc.'s net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Rocket Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 231.11x while loanDepot, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Cos., Inc. is 3.72x versus 0.38x for loanDepot, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a net margin of -6.92% compared to Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 9.03%. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1% beat PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.56%. On the other hand PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $133.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.99%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.485%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays out 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M is lower than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M. Notably, Rocket Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 231.11x while PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Cos., Inc. is 3.72x versus 1.20x for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -6.92% compared to Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 1.43%. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1% beat UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.56%. On the other hand UWM Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.59 which suggests that it could grow by 37.37%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.69%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UWM Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UWM Holdings Corp. pays out 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.3M. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M is lower than UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M. Notably, Rocket Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 231.11x while UWM Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 50.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Cos., Inc. is 3.72x versus 1.76x for UWM Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a net margin of -6.92% compared to Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net margin of 10.45%. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1% beat Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.57, signalling upside risk potential of 17.56%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $83.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.56%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, which suggesting that the stock is 130.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.087%.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays out 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $312M. Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M is lower than Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M. Notably, Rocket Cos., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 231.11x while Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Cos., Inc. is 3.72x versus 1.80x for Walker & Dunlop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.