RKT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of -1.04% compared to Rocket Companies's net margin of 11.75%. Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.03% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 12.34%.

Rocket Companies has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $143.86 which suggests that it could grow by 25.64%. Given that Mr. Cooper Group has higher upside potential than Rocket Companies, analysts believe Mr. Cooper Group is more attractive than Rocket Companies.

Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.022%.

Rocket Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rocket Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rocket Companies quarterly revenues are $999M, which are larger than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $749M. Rocket Companies's net income of -$10.4M is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $88M. Notably, Rocket Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.81x while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Companies is 2.60x versus 2.46x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of -1.04% compared to Rocket Companies's net margin of 36.25%. Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.03% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Rocket Companies has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $59.29 which suggests that it could grow by 8.49%. Given that Rocket Companies has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Rocket Companies is more attractive than Robinhood Markets.

Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rocket Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rocket Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rocket Companies quarterly revenues are $999M, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Rocket Companies's net income of -$10.4M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Rocket Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.81x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 31.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Companies is 2.60x versus 15.43x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UWM Holdings has a net margin of -1.04% compared to Rocket Companies's net margin of -33.21%. Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.03% beat UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.38%.

Rocket Companies has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand UWM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.44 which suggests that it could grow by 52.35%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Rocket Companies, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Rocket Companies.

Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UWM Holdings has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.564%.

Rocket Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UWM Holdings offers a yield of 9.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Rocket Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UWM Holdings pays out 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

Rocket Companies quarterly revenues are $999M, which are larger than UWM Holdings quarterly revenues of $41.2M. Rocket Companies's net income of -$10.4M is higher than UWM Holdings's net income of -$13.7M. Notably, Rocket Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.81x while UWM Holdings's PE ratio is 50.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Companies is 2.60x versus 1.99x for UWM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial has a net margin of -1.04% compared to Rocket Companies's net margin of 30.41%. Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.03% beat Velocity Financial's return on equity of 13.98%.

Rocket Companies has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 25.6%. On the other hand Velocity Financial has an analysts' consensus of $21.33 which suggests that it could grow by 30.88%. Given that Velocity Financial has higher upside potential than Rocket Companies, analysts believe Velocity Financial is more attractive than Rocket Companies.

Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.977%.

Rocket Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Velocity Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rocket Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rocket Companies quarterly revenues are $999M, which are larger than Velocity Financial quarterly revenues of $62.1M. Rocket Companies's net income of -$10.4M is lower than Velocity Financial's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Rocket Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 72.81x while Velocity Financial's PE ratio is 8.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rocket Companies is 2.60x versus 2.63x for Velocity Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.