Financhill
Sell
28

PFSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$92.34
Seasonality move :
-4.71%
Day range:
$93.08 - $96.37
52-week range:
$85.74 - $160.36
Dividend yield:
1.27%
P/E ratio:
10.14x
P/S ratio:
1.20x
P/B ratio:
1.14x
Volume:
736.2K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
-7.56%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$4.4B
EPS (TTM):
$9.31

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$621M $3.23 -33.94% 50.4% $133.00
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$578.5M $8.84 8.49% 259.14% $388.14
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$143.2M $0.81 3.71% 0.83% $72.00
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$75.3M $0.38 -11.44% 328.07% $13.27
RKT
Rocket Cos., Inc.
$2.3B $0.09 78.08% -62.65% $21.57
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$94.33 $133.00 $4.9B 10.14x $0.30 1.27% 1.20x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$322.23 $388.14 $9.1B 14.07x $0.01 0.01% 4.45x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$66.84 $72.00 $3.4B 22.44x $0.62 3.71% 6.20x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
$171.10 -- $462.9M 9.92x $5.50 3.51% 2.96x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$11.85 $13.27 $1B 33.27x $0.40 13.5% 3.38x
RKT
Rocket Cos., Inc.
$18.35 $21.57 $51.7B 231.11x $0.80 0% 3.72x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
84.26% 0.633 335.94% 0.04x
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
45.6% 1.078 29.21% 0.73x
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
-- 0.465 -- 1.23x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
3.47% 0.425 1.7% 1.51x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
52.85% 0.214 143.47% 0.55x
RKT
Rocket Cos., Inc.
71.55% 0.572 54.42% 1.33x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$1.1B $397.4M 2.54% 12.35% 33.58% -$679.3M
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
$734.7M $309.5M 12.73% 20.05% 38.62% $265.4M
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
$113.4M $38.1M 22.73% 27.14% 26.89% $74.5M
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
$40.1M $16.8M 26.2% 27.16% 40.62% $21.7M
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$67.1M $32.3M 1.09% 2.21% 42.26% $41.5M
RKT
Rocket Cos., Inc.
$1.7B $51.8M 1.34% 4.1% 2.9% -$71.8M

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or AMG?

    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 47.18%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35% beat Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 20.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    91.68% $11.03 $7.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or AMG?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $388.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.46%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    5 1 0
  • Is PFSI or AMG More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.806%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or AMG?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. pays out 0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or AMG?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $801.4M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M is lower than Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s net income of $378.1M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.14x while Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.20x versus 4.45x for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.20x 10.14x $1.2B $106.8M
    AMG
    Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
    4.45x 14.07x $801.4M $378.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or CNS?

    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 21.69%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    80.08% $0.68 $562M
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or CNS?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    1 1 0
  • Is PFSI or CNS More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or CNS?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or CNS?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M is higher than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.14x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.20x versus 6.20x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.20x 10.14x $1.2B $106.8M
    CNS
    Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
    6.20x 22.44x $141.6M $30.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or DHIL?

    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 32.75%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    96.73% $4.99 $187.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is PFSI or DHIL More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.143%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.14x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.20x versus 2.96x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.20x 10.14x $1.2B $106.8M
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    2.96x 9.92x $41.4M $13.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or OCSL?

    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 7.34%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    87.83% $0.06 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.27 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    0 7 0
  • Is PFSI or OCSL More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.641%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 13.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $76.4M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.14x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.20x versus 3.38x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.20x 10.14x $1.2B $106.8M
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    3.38x 33.27x $76.4M $5.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or RKT?

    Rocket Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 9.03% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of -6.92%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.35% beat Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    90.45% $1.97 $27.4B
    RKT
    Rocket Cos., Inc.
    95.62% -$0.06 $31.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or RKT?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.99%. On the other hand Rocket Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 17.56%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    RKT
    Rocket Cos., Inc.
    5 9 0
  • Is PFSI or RKT More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.485% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.896%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or RKT?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Rocket Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 12.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or RKT?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $106.8M is higher than Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.14x while Rocket Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 231.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.20x versus 3.72x for Rocket Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.20x 10.14x $1.2B $106.8M
    RKT
    Rocket Cos., Inc.
    3.72x 231.11x $1.8B -$123.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x

Alerts

Sell
23
CAR alert for Feb 20

Avis Budget Group, Inc. [CAR] is down 0.3% over the past day.

Buy
75
HYMC alert for Feb 20

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is down 2.47% over the past day.

Sell
1
EPAM alert for Feb 20

EPAM Systems, Inc. [EPAM] is down 0.11% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock