Financhill
Buy
67

PFSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$131.52
Seasonality move :
-1.33%
Day range:
$131.69 - $133.51
52-week range:
$85.74 - $137.53
Dividend yield:
0.91%
P/E ratio:
14.16x
P/S ratio:
1.68x
P/B ratio:
1.62x
Volume:
261.5K
Avg. volume:
323K
1-year change:
31.72%
Market cap:
$6.8B
Revenue:
$3.9B
EPS (TTM):
$9.29

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$626.8M $3.46 -43.71% 69.75% $147.75
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
$26M $0.23 20.86% -77.67% $14.13
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
$201.1M $0.37 6.28% -10.95% $15.00
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
$76.8M $0.36 178.26% 43.63% $12.91
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$74.8M $0.38 9.21% 329.34% $13.71
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$131.51 $147.75 $6.8B 14.16x $0.30 0.91% 1.68x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
$170.22 -- $460.5M 9.87x $5.50 3.53% 2.95x
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
$13.94 $14.13 $552.7M 5.60x $0.08 6.89% 5.85x
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
$13.57 $15.00 $3.6B 9.58x $0.39 11.5% 4.50x
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
$11.46 $12.91 $1.1B 10.72x $0.38 13.26% 4.51x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$12.72 $13.71 $1.1B 33.43x $0.40 12.58% 3.65x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
76.94% 0.654 218.44% 0.07x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
3.47% 0.346 1.7% 1.51x
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
50.88% 0.424 101.44% 0.04x
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
55.17% 0.388 134.58% 1.25x
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
58.33% 0.853 171.19% 0.44x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
50.36% 0.282 129.35% 0.57x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
$1.2B $467M 2.86% 12.65% 36.05% -$679.3M
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
$40.1M $16.8M 26.2% 27.16% 40.62% $21.7M
GAIN
Gladstone Investment Corp.
-$14.2M $39.3M 9.5% 18.81% -842.46% $8.9M
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
$140.5M $169.7M 4.24% 9.39% 92% $62.3M
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
$50.9M $59.8M 3.05% 7.18% 94.06% $29.2M
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
$71.1M $50.9M 1.13% 2.31% 60.38% $47.8M

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or DHIL?

    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.01% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 32.75%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.65% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    89.64% $3.37 $18.2B
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    96.73% $4.99 $187.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is PFSI or DHIL More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.129%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 17.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or DHIL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $181.5M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.16x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.68x versus 2.95x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.68x 14.16x $1.3B $181.5M
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
    2.95x 9.87x $41.4M $13.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or GAIN?

    Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of 14.01% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of -616.21%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.65% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    89.64% $3.37 $18.2B
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment Corp.
    83.41% $0.75 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or GAIN?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.33%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment Corp.
    2 3 0
  • Is PFSI or GAIN More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.074%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or GAIN?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 6.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 17.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or GAIN?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $181.5M is higher than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.16x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.68x versus 5.85x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.68x 14.16x $1.3B $181.5M
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment Corp.
    5.85x 5.60x -$4.7M $28.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or GBDC?

    Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of 14.01% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 52.21%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.65% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.39%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    89.64% $3.37 $18.2B
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
    76.16% $0.36 $8.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or GBDC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.54%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, Inc., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
    2 2 0
  • Is PFSI or GBDC More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.58%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or GBDC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 17.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or GBDC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.4M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $181.5M is higher than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.16x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.68x versus 4.50x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.68x 14.16x $1.3B $181.5M
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
    4.50x 9.58x $184.4M $96.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or MFIC?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 14.01% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 43.19%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.65% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    89.64% $3.37 $18.2B
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    80.13% $0.29 $3.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or MFIC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than PennyMac Financial Services, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    2 4 0
  • Is PFSI or MFIC More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.449%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or MFIC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 17.13% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or MFIC?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $181.5M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.16x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.68x versus 4.51x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.68x 14.16x $1.3B $181.5M
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4.51x 10.72x $63.6M $27.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PFSI or OCSL?

    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 14.01% compared to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net margin of 29.17%. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.65% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    89.64% $3.37 $18.2B
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    84.43% $0.28 $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $147.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.77%. Given that PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    4 3 0
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    0 7 0
  • Is PFSI or OCSL More Risky?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.916% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.647%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. pays 17.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PFSI or OCSL?

    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of $181.5M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.16x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is 1.68x versus 3.65x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PFSI
    PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
    1.68x 14.16x $1.3B $181.5M
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.
    3.65x 33.43x $84.3M $24.6M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?

In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…

Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?

AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…

Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?

In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
45
CTEV alert for Jan 4

Claritev Corp. [CTEV] is down 20.7% over the past day.

Buy
60
BIDU alert for Jan 3

Baidu, Inc. [BIDU] is up 15.01% over the past day.

Sell
47
ASTS alert for Jan 4

AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 14.94% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock