CNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 31.66% compared to Cohen & Steers's net margin of 99.99%. Cohen & Steers's return on equity of 28.66% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $92.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 4.55%. Given that Cohen & Steers has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Cohen & Steers is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.549, which suggesting that the stock is 54.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.762%.

Cohen & Steers has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cohen & Steers pays 78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & Steers quarterly revenues are $144.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Cohen & Steers's net income of $45.8M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Cohen & Steers's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 6.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers is 7.37x versus 7.23x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 31.66% compared to Cohen & Steers's net margin of 93.71%. Cohen & Steers's return on equity of 28.66% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97%.

Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $92.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Cohen & Steers has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe Cohen & Steers is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.549, which suggesting that the stock is 54.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.835%.

Cohen & Steers has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Cohen & Steers pays 78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Cohen & Steers quarterly revenues are $144.7M, which are larger than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Cohen & Steers's net income of $45.8M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M. Notably, Cohen & Steers's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers is 7.37x versus 10.68x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 31.66% compared to Cohen & Steers's net margin of 90.38%. Cohen & Steers's return on equity of 28.66% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $92.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 11.64%. Given that Cohen & Steers has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Cohen & Steers is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.549, which suggesting that the stock is 54.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Cohen & Steers has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cohen & Steers pays 78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Cohen & Steers quarterly revenues are $144.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Cohen & Steers's net income of $45.8M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Cohen & Steers's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers is 7.37x versus 9.16x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 31.66% compared to Cohen & Steers's net margin of -121.48%. Cohen & Steers's return on equity of 28.66% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Cohen & Steers has a consensus price target of $92.33, signalling upside risk potential of 18.83%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.03%. Given that Cohen & Steers has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Cohen & Steers is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Cohen & Steers has a beta of 1.549, which suggesting that the stock is 54.893% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Cohen & Steers has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Cohen & Steers pays 78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Cohen & Steers quarterly revenues are $144.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Cohen & Steers's net income of $45.8M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Cohen & Steers's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers is 7.37x versus 26.27x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.