CNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 32.75%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $71.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.7M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.85x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 5.88x versus 2.94x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of -616.21%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $71.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M is higher than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.85x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 5.88x versus 5.74x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 43.19%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $71.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.92%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.85x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 5.88x versus 4.50x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 29.38% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 29.17%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 29.77% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $71.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.124% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 79.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $41.6M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.85x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 5.88x versus 3.65x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.