CNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 21.69% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 32.75%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.129%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.6M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 6.38x versus 2.96x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of 21.69% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of -616.21%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.69%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.074%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 6.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.6M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M is higher than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 6.38x versus 5.83x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 21.69% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 43.19%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.66 which suggests that it could grow by 9.48%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.449%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.6M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 6.38x versus 4.55x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 21.69% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net margin of 29.17%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 6.35%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.804% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.647%.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues are $141.6M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is 6.38x versus 3.70x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.