GAMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 26.36% compared to GAMCO Investors's net margin of 99.99%. GAMCO Investors's return on equity of 36.51% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

GAMCO Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.1%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.9%. Given that GAMCO Investors has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe GAMCO Investors is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

GAMCO Investors has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

GAMCO Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. GAMCO Investors pays 6.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GAMCO Investors quarterly revenues are $63.9M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. GAMCO Investors's net income of $16.8M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, GAMCO Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAMCO Investors is 2.39x versus 13.17x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 26.36% compared to GAMCO Investors's net margin of 98.44%. GAMCO Investors's return on equity of 36.51% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68%.

GAMCO Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.1%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that GAMCO Investors has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe GAMCO Investors is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

GAMCO Investors has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.151%.

GAMCO Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. GAMCO Investors pays 6.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. GAMCO Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

GAMCO Investors quarterly revenues are $63.9M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $94.2M. GAMCO Investors's net income of $16.8M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M. Notably, GAMCO Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAMCO Investors is 2.39x versus 11.18x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 26.36% compared to GAMCO Investors's net margin of 89.54%. GAMCO Investors's return on equity of 36.51% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

GAMCO Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.1%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.32%. Given that GAMCO Investors has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe GAMCO Investors is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

GAMCO Investors has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.968%.

GAMCO Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. GAMCO Investors pays 6.71% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. GAMCO Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

GAMCO Investors quarterly revenues are $63.9M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. GAMCO Investors's net income of $16.8M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, GAMCO Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAMCO Investors is 2.39x versus 7.20x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 26.36% compared to GAMCO Investors's net margin of -121.48%. GAMCO Investors's return on equity of 36.51% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

GAMCO Investors has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.1%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that GAMCO Investors has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe GAMCO Investors is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

GAMCO Investors has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.581% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.

GAMCO Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.66%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. GAMCO Investors pays 6.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. GAMCO Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

GAMCO Investors quarterly revenues are $63.9M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. GAMCO Investors's net income of $16.8M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, GAMCO Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAMCO Investors is 2.39x versus 21.20x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.