CFNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 21.69%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 27.14%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, which suggesting that the stock is 83.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.929%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $141.6M. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 25.80x versus 6.23x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 32.75%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that California First Leasing Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe California First Leasing Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, which suggesting that the stock is 83.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.143%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 25.80x versus 2.97x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GAMCO Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 23.02%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat GAMCO Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 47.63%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GAMCO Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24%. Given that GAMCO Investors, Inc. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe GAMCO Investors, Inc. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, which suggesting that the stock is 83.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GAMCO Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.97%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GAMCO Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GAMCO Investors, Inc. pays out 6.2% of its earnings as a dividend. GAMCO Investors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GAMCO Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $66.1M. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than GAMCO Investors, Inc.'s net income of $15.2M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while GAMCO Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 25.80x versus 2.31x for GAMCO Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 7.34%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.21%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.27 which suggests that it could grow by 14.76%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.161, which suggesting that the stock is 83.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.641%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 13.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $76.4M. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.85x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 32.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 25.80x versus 3.30x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.