CFNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CV Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of --. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat CV Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CV Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24490.16%. Given that CV Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe CV Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CV Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.306%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CV Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CV Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CV Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than CV Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.50x while CV Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 20.79x versus 0.01x for CV Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 73.36%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.36%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that California First Leasing Corp. has higher upside potential than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., analysts believe California First Leasing Corp. is more attractive than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. has a beta of 0.034, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.56%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s net income of $1M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.50x while Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 20.79x versus 13.03x for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 27.82%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat Park National Corp.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.72%. Given that Park National Corp. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Park National Corp. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National Corp. has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.635%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National Corp. offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp. pays out 45.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National Corp. quarterly revenues of $169.5M. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Park National Corp.'s net income of $47.2M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.50x while Park National Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 20.79x versus 3.90x for Park National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransUnion has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing Corp.'s net margin of 8.57%. California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72% beat TransUnion's return on equity of 9.76%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TransUnion has an analysts' consensus of $106.95 which suggests that it could grow by 28.25%. Given that TransUnion has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe TransUnion is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransUnion has a beta of 1.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.973%.

California First Leasing Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransUnion offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. California First Leasing Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion pays out 29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TransUnion quarterly revenues of $1.2B. California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than TransUnion's net income of $100.2M. Notably, California First Leasing Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.50x while TransUnion's PE ratio is 39.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing Corp. is 20.79x versus 3.70x for TransUnion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.