UWMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Onity Group, Inc. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 5.87%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53% beat Onity Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.7%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Onity Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.15%. Given that Onity Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings Corp., analysts believe Onity Group, Inc. is more attractive than UWM Holdings Corp..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.928, which suggesting that the stock is 92.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.802%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.9%. Onity Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $843.3M, which are larger than Onity Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $318.6M. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M is lower than Onity Group, Inc.'s net income of $18.7M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Onity Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 2.13x versus 0.36x for Onity Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -6.92%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53% beat Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Rocket Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.58%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.928, which suggesting that the stock is 92.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.267, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.716%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.9%. Rocket Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $843.3M, which are smaller than Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M is higher than Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Rocket Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 244.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 2.13x versus 3.93x for Rocket Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 15.72%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53% beat Velocity Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.98%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Velocity Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.22%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Velocity Financial, Inc..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.928, which suggesting that the stock is 92.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.718%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.9%. Velocity Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $843.3M, which are larger than Velocity Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $159.4M. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M is lower than Velocity Financial, Inc.'s net income of $25.1M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Velocity Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 2.13x versus 1.25x for Velocity Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a net margin of 1.43% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 10.45%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53% beat Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.69%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.45%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings Corp., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than UWM Holdings Corp..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.928, which suggesting that the stock is 92.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.357%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.9%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays out 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings Corp.'s is not.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $843.3M, which are larger than Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $312M. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M is lower than Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 2.13x versus 1.77x for Walker & Dunlop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.