UWMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Onity Group, Inc. has a net margin of 16.34% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 41.33%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 14.16% beat Onity Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.3%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.68, signalling upside risk potential of 84.49%. On the other hand Onity Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.84%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Onity Group, Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Onity Group, Inc..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.934, which suggesting that the stock is 93.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.958%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.42%. Onity Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 329.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Onity Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $308M. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $164.5M is higher than Onity Group, Inc.'s net income of $127.3M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.45x while Onity Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 0.62x versus 0.31x for Onity Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 16.34% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 2.72%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 14.16% beat Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of -2.06%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.68, signalling upside risk potential of 84.49%. On the other hand Rocket Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.32 which suggests that it could grow by 46.95%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.934, which suggesting that the stock is 93.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.315%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.42%. Rocket Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 329.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $164.5M is higher than Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of $68M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.45x while Rocket Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 229.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 0.62x versus 3.63x for Rocket Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vaycaychella has a net margin of 16.34% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of --. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 14.16% beat Vaycaychella's return on equity of --.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.68, signalling upside risk potential of 84.49%. On the other hand Vaycaychella has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Vaycaychella, analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Vaycaychella.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.934, which suggesting that the stock is 93.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vaycaychella has a beta of 40.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3991.449%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.42%. Vaycaychella offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 329.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Vaycaychella pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Vaycaychella quarterly revenues of --. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $164.5M is higher than Vaycaychella's net income of --. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.45x while Vaycaychella's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 0.62x versus -- for Vaycaychella. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a net margin of 16.34% compared to UWM Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -3.57%. UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 14.16% beat Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.12%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.68, signalling upside risk potential of 84.49%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50.47%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Walker & Dunlop, Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Walker & Dunlop, Inc..

UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.934, which suggesting that the stock is 93.351% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.871%.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.42%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. offers a yield of 6.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. UWM Holdings Corp. pays 329.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays out 162.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues of $381.3M. UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $164.5M is higher than Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of -$13.6M. Notably, UWM Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.45x while Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings Corp. is 0.62x versus 1.22x for Walker & Dunlop, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.