WD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Onity Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of 51%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Onity Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.28%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Onity Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.49%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Onity Group, Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Onity Group, Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.884%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Onity Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are larger than Onity Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $249.4M. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is lower than Onity Group, Inc.'s net income of $127.2M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.36x while Onity Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.72x versus 0.36x for Onity Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of -6.92%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Rocket Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 15.48%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.896%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Rocket Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are smaller than Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.36x while Rocket Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 235.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.72x versus 3.79x for Rocket Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of 1.43%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand UWM Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.59 which suggests that it could grow by 34.84%. Given that UWM Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Walker & Dunlop, Inc., analysts believe UWM Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Walker & Dunlop, Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.69%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. UWM Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 8.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. UWM Holdings Corp. pays out 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings Corp.'s is not.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are smaller than UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.3M. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.36x while UWM Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 50.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.72x versus 1.79x for UWM Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vaycaychella has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of --. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Vaycaychella's return on equity of --.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Vaycaychella has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Vaycaychella, analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Vaycaychella.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.087% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vaycaychella has a beta of 40.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3991.449%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.33%. Vaycaychella offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Vaycaychella pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are larger than Vaycaychella quarterly revenues of --. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than Vaycaychella's net income of --. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.36x while Vaycaychella's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.72x versus -- for Vaycaychella. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.