WD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Onity Group, Inc. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of 5.87%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Onity Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.7%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Onity Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Onity Group, Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Onity Group, Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.587, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.679%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Onity Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are smaller than Onity Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $318.6M. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than Onity Group, Inc.'s net income of $18.7M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.33x while Onity Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.81x versus 0.43x for Onity Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of -6.92%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Rocket Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 4.1%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Rocket Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 0.33%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rocket Cos., Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Rocket Cos., Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Cos., Inc. has a beta of 2.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.149%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Rocket Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are smaller than Rocket Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than Rocket Cos., Inc.'s net income of -$123.9M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.33x while Rocket Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 270.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.81x versus 4.36x for Rocket Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UWM Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of 1.43%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat UWM Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 6.53%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand UWM Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $6.59 which suggests that it could grow by 13.69%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than UWM Holdings Corp., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than UWM Holdings Corp..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UWM Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.61%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. UWM Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 6.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. UWM Holdings Corp. pays out 309.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings Corp.'s is not.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are smaller than UWM Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.3M. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than UWM Holdings Corp.'s net income of $12.1M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.33x while UWM Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 50.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.81x versus 2.13x for UWM Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 10.45% compared to Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net margin of 15.72%. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.18% beat Velocity Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.98%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Velocity Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.26%. Given that Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has higher upside potential than Velocity Financial, Inc., analysts believe Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is more attractive than Velocity Financial, Inc..

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.2%.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Velocity Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Walker & Dunlop, Inc. pays 81.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. quarterly revenues are $312M, which are larger than Velocity Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $159.4M. Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s net income of $32.6M is higher than Velocity Financial, Inc.'s net income of $25.1M. Notably, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.33x while Velocity Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is 1.81x versus 1.29x for Velocity Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.