PBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genesis Energy LP has a net margin of 16.33% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net margin of 5.5%. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s return on equity of 10.28% beat Genesis Energy LP's return on equity of -4.27%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a consensus price target of $48.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.85%. On the other hand Genesis Energy LP has an analysts' consensus of $19.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.59%. Given that Pembina Pipeline Corp. has higher upside potential than Genesis Energy LP, analysts believe Pembina Pipeline Corp. is more attractive than Genesis Energy LP.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesis Energy LP has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.089%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Genesis Energy LP offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Pembina Pipeline Corp. pays 91.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesis Energy LP pays out 493.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Genesis Energy LP's is not.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Genesis Energy LP quarterly revenues of $414M. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Genesis Energy LP's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Genesis Energy LP's PE ratio is 34.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pembina Pipeline Corp. is 3.82x versus 1.02x for Genesis Energy LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 16.33% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net margin of 58.55%. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s return on equity of 10.28% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a consensus price target of $48.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.85%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pembina Pipeline Corp. has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Pembina Pipeline Corp. is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.438%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Pembina Pipeline Corp. pays 91.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Petroleum Trust's is not.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $223.4K. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K. Notably, Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 13.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pembina Pipeline Corp. is 3.82x versus 8.66x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has a net margin of 16.33% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net margin of -3.71%. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s return on equity of 10.28% beat Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a consensus price target of $48.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.85%. On the other hand Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Pembina Pipeline Corp. has higher upside potential than Nordic American Tankers Ltd., analysts believe Pembina Pipeline Corp. is more attractive than Nordic American Tankers Ltd..

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has a beta of -0.433, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.349%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Nordic American Tankers Ltd. offers a yield of 9.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pembina Pipeline Corp. pays 91.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers Ltd. pays out 180.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s is not.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Nordic American Tankers Ltd. quarterly revenues of $75M. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net income of $207.7M is higher than Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s PE ratio is 429.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pembina Pipeline Corp. is 3.82x versus 2.94x for Nordic American Tankers Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 16.33% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net margin of 3.7%. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s return on equity of 10.28% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 8.75%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a consensus price target of $48.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.85%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.81 which suggests that it could grow by 4.93%. Given that Pembina Pipeline Corp. has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Pembina Pipeline Corp. is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.663%.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Pembina Pipeline Corp. pays 91.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 242.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains GP Holdings LP's is not.

Pembina Pipeline Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s net income of $207.7M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $428M. Notably, Pembina Pipeline Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.46x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pembina Pipeline Corp. is 3.82x versus 0.09x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.