MARPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NGL Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 58.55% compared to Marine Petroleum Trust's net margin of 4.42%. Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46% beat NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 13.4%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NGL Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -47.2%. Given that NGL Energy Partners LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe NGL Energy Partners LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, which suggesting that the stock is 73.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.227%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.1%. NGL Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Petroleum Trust pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. NGL Energy Partners LP pays out -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues are $223.4K, which are smaller than NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of $674.7M. Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K is lower than NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Marine Petroleum Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while NGL Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Petroleum Trust is 8.91x versus 0.32x for NGL Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 58.55% compared to Marine Petroleum Trust's net margin of 3.7%. Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 8.75%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.81 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, which suggesting that the stock is 73.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.842%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.1%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Marine Petroleum Trust pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 242.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues are $223.4K, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $428M. Notably, Marine Petroleum Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Petroleum Trust is 8.91x versus 0.08x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of 58.55% compared to Marine Petroleum Trust's net margin of 96.39%. Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46% beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 955.11%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -58.94%. Given that Sabine Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Sabine Royalty Trust is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, which suggesting that the stock is 73.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.202%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.1%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 6.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Marine Petroleum Trust pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out 99.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Petroleum Trust's is not.

Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues are $223.4K, which are smaller than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $25.7M. Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K is lower than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $24.8M. Notably, Marine Petroleum Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 14.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Petroleum Trust is 8.91x versus 13.83x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Midstream Corp. has a net margin of 58.55% compared to Marine Petroleum Trust's net margin of 3.4%. Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46% beat Summit Midstream Corp.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Summit Midstream Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.73%. Given that Summit Midstream Corp. has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Summit Midstream Corp. is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, which suggesting that the stock is 73.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Midstream Corp. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.288%.

Marine Petroleum Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.1%. Summit Midstream Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marine Petroleum Trust pays 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Midstream Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues are $223.4K, which are smaller than Summit Midstream Corp. quarterly revenues of $146.9M. Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K is lower than Summit Midstream Corp.'s net income of $5M. Notably, Marine Petroleum Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Summit Midstream Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marine Petroleum Trust is 8.91x versus 0.57x for Summit Midstream Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.