NGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 4.42% compared to NGL Energy Partners LP's net margin of 58.55%. NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 13.4% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -47.2%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NGL Energy Partners LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe NGL Energy Partners LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.114%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 7.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. NGL Energy Partners LP pays -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend.

NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues are $674.7M, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $223.4K. NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $29.8M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K. Notably, NGL Energy Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 13.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NGL Energy Partners LP is 0.32x versus 8.91x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 4.42% compared to NGL Energy Partners LP's net margin of 3.7%. NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 13.4% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 8.75%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -47.2%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.81 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than NGL Energy Partners LP, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than NGL Energy Partners LP.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.842%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. NGL Energy Partners LP pays -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 242.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues are $674.7M, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $29.8M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $428M. Notably, NGL Energy Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NGL Energy Partners LP is 0.32x versus 0.08x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of 4.42% compared to NGL Energy Partners LP's net margin of 96.39%. NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 13.4% beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 955.11%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -47.2%. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -58.94%. Given that Sabine Royalty Trust has more downside risk than NGL Energy Partners LP, analysts believe NGL Energy Partners LP is more attractive than Sabine Royalty Trust.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.202%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 6.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. NGL Energy Partners LP pays -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out 99.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues are $674.7M, which are larger than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $25.7M. NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $29.8M is higher than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $24.8M. Notably, NGL Energy Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 14.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NGL Energy Partners LP is 0.32x versus 13.83x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Midstream Corp. has a net margin of 4.42% compared to NGL Energy Partners LP's net margin of 3.4%. NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 13.4% beat Summit Midstream Corp.'s return on equity of -1.87%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling downside risk potential of -47.2%. On the other hand Summit Midstream Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.73%. Given that NGL Energy Partners LP has more downside risk than Summit Midstream Corp., analysts believe Summit Midstream Corp. is more attractive than NGL Energy Partners LP.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.227% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Midstream Corp. has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.288%.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Summit Midstream Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NGL Energy Partners LP pays -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Midstream Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues are $674.7M, which are larger than Summit Midstream Corp. quarterly revenues of $146.9M. NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $29.8M is higher than Summit Midstream Corp.'s net income of $5M. Notably, NGL Energy Partners LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Summit Midstream Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NGL Energy Partners LP is 0.32x versus 0.57x for Summit Midstream Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.