PAGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 71.51%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 10.15% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 78.23%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.54%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.541%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 6.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 136.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $10.6B, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $268.2K. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $306M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $191.8K. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 13.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.10x versus 9.20x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NGL Energy Partners LP has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 5.3%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 10.15% beat NGL Energy Partners LP's return on equity of 19.19%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.54%. On the other hand NGL Energy Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -57.98%. Given that NGL Energy Partners LP has more downside risk than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than NGL Energy Partners LP.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NGL Energy Partners LP has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.795%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. NGL Energy Partners LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 136.21% of its earnings as a dividend. NGL Energy Partners LP pays out -469.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $10.6B, which are larger than NGL Energy Partners LP quarterly revenues of $909.8M. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $306M is higher than NGL Energy Partners LP's net income of $48.2M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while NGL Energy Partners LP's PE ratio is 308.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.10x versus 0.48x for NGL Energy Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 3.08%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 10.15% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 11.66%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.54%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.18 which suggests that it could grow by 2.3%. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.417%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 136.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 91.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains GP Holdings LP's is not.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $10.6B, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $306M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $325M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 12.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.10x versus 0.33x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabine Royalty Trust has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Plains GP Holdings LP's net margin of 96.39%. Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 10.15% beat Sabine Royalty Trust's return on equity of 955.11%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a consensus price target of $21.08, signalling downside risk potential of -4.54%. On the other hand Sabine Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -54.29%. Given that Sabine Royalty Trust has more downside risk than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Sabine Royalty Trust.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabine Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.297, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.293%.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Sabine Royalty Trust offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Plains GP Holdings LP pays 136.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust pays out 99.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabine Royalty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains GP Holdings LP's is not.

Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues are $10.6B, which are larger than Sabine Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $25.7M. Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $306M is higher than Sabine Royalty Trust's net income of $24.8M. Notably, Plains GP Holdings LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.73x while Sabine Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 13.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains GP Holdings LP is 0.10x versus 12.42x for Sabine Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.