Financhill
Sell
43

NAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$2.43
Seasonality move :
3.19%
Day range:
$2.41 - $2.50
52-week range:
$2.41 - $4.65
Dividend yield:
16.39%
P/E ratio:
8.41x
P/S ratio:
1.18x
P/B ratio:
1.00x
Volume:
3.5M
Avg. volume:
2.8M
1-year change:
-43.39%
Market cap:
$509.5M
Revenue:
$391.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.29

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NAT
Nordic American Tankers
$57M $0.06 -71.88% -45.84% --
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
-- -- -- -- --
FRO
Frontline PLC
$317.6M $0.38 -31.9% -74.32% $32.39
GLNG
Golar LNG
$67.5M $0.33 -5.12% -61.94% $46.21
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- -- -- -- --
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$13.1B $0.37 7.54% 63.46% $20.58
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NAT
Nordic American Tankers
$2.44 -- $509.5M 8.41x $0.04 16.39% 1.18x
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
$0.65 -- $13.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.18x
FRO
Frontline PLC
$13.38 $32.39 $3B 4.47x $0.34 14.57% 1.46x
GLNG
Golar LNG
$41.33 $46.21 $4.3B 324.95x $0.25 2.42% 15.82x
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
$3.79 -- $7.6M 10.38x $0.10 9.38% 7.66x
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$18.18 $20.58 $3.6B 21.64x $0.32 6.99% 0.07x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NAT
Nordic American Tankers
35.25% -0.097 39.52% 0.41x
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
-- 0.057 -- --
FRO
Frontline PLC
61.74% 0.405 74.49% 0.60x
GLNG
Golar LNG
41.2% 0.650 32.16% 1.43x
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- -1.110 -- --
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
100% 0.897 47.1% 0.90x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NAT
Nordic American Tankers
$22.1M $16.2M 7.76% 11.92% 31.54% $34.4M
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
-- -$329K -- -- -- -$855K
FRO
Frontline PLC
$151.7M $144.8M 9.4% 23.48% 30.12% $162.1M
GLNG
Golar LNG
$18.6M $8.4M 0.35% 0.52% -53.72% --
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- $217.9K 74.27% 74.27% 76.04% --
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$929M $347M 0.78% 1.12% 3.56% $510M

Nordic American Tankers vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NAT or BPT?

    BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a net margin of 16.69% compared to Nordic American Tankers's net margin of --. Nordic American Tankers's return on equity of 11.92% beat BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    42.38% $0.04 $787.9M
    BPT
    BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
    -- -$0.01 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NAT or BPT?

    Nordic American Tankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 87.5%. On the other hand BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nordic American Tankers has higher upside potential than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust, analysts believe Nordic American Tankers is more attractive than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    0 0 0
    BPT
    BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is NAT or BPT More Risky?

    Nordic American Tankers has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.058, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.161%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAT or BPT?

    Nordic American Tankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.39%. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nordic American Tankers pays 90.96% of its earnings as a dividend. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust pays out 113.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NAT or BPT?

    Nordic American Tankers quarterly revenues are $52M, which are larger than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of --. Nordic American Tankers's net income of $8.7M is higher than BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's net income of -$272K. Notably, Nordic American Tankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordic American Tankers is 1.18x versus 0.18x for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    1.18x 8.41x $52M $8.7M
    BPT
    BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
    0.18x -- -- -$272K
  • Which has Higher Returns NAT or FRO?

    Frontline PLC has a net margin of 16.69% compared to Nordic American Tankers's net margin of 12.33%. Nordic American Tankers's return on equity of 11.92% beat Frontline PLC's return on equity of 23.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    42.38% $0.04 $787.9M
    FRO
    Frontline PLC
    30.95% $0.27 $6.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NAT or FRO?

    Nordic American Tankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 87.5%. On the other hand Frontline PLC has an analysts' consensus of $32.39 which suggests that it could grow by 109.59%. Given that Frontline PLC has higher upside potential than Nordic American Tankers, analysts believe Frontline PLC is more attractive than Nordic American Tankers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    0 0 0
    FRO
    Frontline PLC
    4 1 0
  • Is NAT or FRO More Risky?

    Nordic American Tankers has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontline PLC has a beta of 0.001, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.876%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAT or FRO?

    Nordic American Tankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.39%. Frontline PLC offers a yield of 14.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Nordic American Tankers pays 90.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Frontline PLC pays out 97.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NAT or FRO?

    Nordic American Tankers quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Frontline PLC quarterly revenues of $490.3M. Nordic American Tankers's net income of $8.7M is lower than Frontline PLC's net income of $60.5M. Notably, Nordic American Tankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Frontline PLC's PE ratio is 4.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordic American Tankers is 1.18x versus 1.46x for Frontline PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    1.18x 8.41x $52M $8.7M
    FRO
    Frontline PLC
    1.46x 4.47x $490.3M $60.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns NAT or GLNG?

    Golar LNG has a net margin of 16.69% compared to Nordic American Tankers's net margin of -53.67%. Nordic American Tankers's return on equity of 11.92% beat Golar LNG's return on equity of 0.52%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    42.38% $0.04 $787.9M
    GLNG
    Golar LNG
    28.65% -$0.34 $4B
  • What do Analysts Say About NAT or GLNG?

    Nordic American Tankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 87.5%. On the other hand Golar LNG has an analysts' consensus of $46.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Nordic American Tankers has higher upside potential than Golar LNG, analysts believe Nordic American Tankers is more attractive than Golar LNG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    0 0 0
    GLNG
    Golar LNG
    5 1 0
  • Is NAT or GLNG More Risky?

    Nordic American Tankers has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golar LNG has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.509%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAT or GLNG?

    Nordic American Tankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.39%. Golar LNG offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Nordic American Tankers pays 90.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Golar LNG pays out -219.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NAT or GLNG?

    Nordic American Tankers quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Golar LNG quarterly revenues of $64.8M. Nordic American Tankers's net income of $8.7M is higher than Golar LNG's net income of -$34.8M. Notably, Nordic American Tankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Golar LNG's PE ratio is 324.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordic American Tankers is 1.18x versus 15.82x for Golar LNG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    1.18x 8.41x $52M $8.7M
    GLNG
    Golar LNG
    15.82x 324.95x $64.8M -$34.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns NAT or MARPS?

    Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 16.69% compared to Nordic American Tankers's net margin of 81.52%. Nordic American Tankers's return on equity of 11.92% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 74.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    42.38% $0.04 $787.9M
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    -- $0.12 $1M
  • What do Analysts Say About NAT or MARPS?

    Nordic American Tankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 87.5%. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nordic American Tankers has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Nordic American Tankers is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    0 0 0
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is NAT or MARPS More Risky?

    Nordic American Tankers has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.246, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.443%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAT or MARPS?

    Nordic American Tankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.39%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 9.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nordic American Tankers pays 90.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NAT or MARPS?

    Nordic American Tankers quarterly revenues are $52M, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $286.5K. Nordic American Tankers's net income of $8.7M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $233.6K. Notably, Nordic American Tankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordic American Tankers is 1.18x versus 7.66x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    1.18x 8.41x $52M $8.7M
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    7.66x 10.38x $286.5K $233.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns NAT or PAGP?

    Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 16.69% compared to Nordic American Tankers's net margin of 0.26%. Nordic American Tankers's return on equity of 11.92% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 1.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    42.38% $0.04 $787.9M
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    7.29% $0.17 $21.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About NAT or PAGP?

    Nordic American Tankers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 87.5%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.58 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Nordic American Tankers has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Nordic American Tankers is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    0 0 0
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    6 6 0
  • Is NAT or PAGP More Risky?

    Nordic American Tankers has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.385%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NAT or PAGP?

    Nordic American Tankers has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.39%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Nordic American Tankers pays 90.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 105.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains GP Holdings LP's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NAT or PAGP?

    Nordic American Tankers quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Nordic American Tankers's net income of $8.7M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $33M. Notably, Nordic American Tankers's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 21.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nordic American Tankers is 1.18x versus 0.07x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers
    1.18x 8.41x $52M $8.7M
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    0.07x 21.64x $12.7B $33M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock