MOGU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -- compared to MOGU's net margin of 3.35%. MOGU's return on equity of -7.88% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

MOGU has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1288.27%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 94.3%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

MOGU has a beta of 0.341, which suggesting that the stock is 65.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.143%.

MOGU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. MOGU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MOGU quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. MOGU's net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, MOGU's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MOGU is 0.94x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cango has a net margin of -- compared to MOGU's net margin of 8.37%. MOGU's return on equity of -7.88% beat Cango's return on equity of 7.6%.

MOGU has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1288.27%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.96%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Cango.

MOGU has a beta of 0.341, which suggesting that the stock is 65.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.913%.

MOGU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MOGU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MOGU quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cango quarterly revenues of $92.8M. MOGU's net income of -- is lower than Cango's net income of $7.8M. Notably, MOGU's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MOGU is 0.94x versus 3.91x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -- compared to MOGU's net margin of -36.2%. MOGU's return on equity of -7.88% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

MOGU has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1288.27%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.02 which suggests that it could grow by 27.61%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than NIO.

MOGU has a beta of 0.341, which suggesting that the stock is 65.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

MOGU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MOGU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MOGU quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. MOGU's net income of -- is lower than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, MOGU's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MOGU is 0.94x versus 0.88x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -- compared to MOGU's net margin of -23.56%. MOGU's return on equity of -7.88% beat Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57%.

MOGU has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1288.27%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 94.95%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Tuniu.

MOGU has a beta of 0.341, which suggesting that the stock is 65.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.56%.

MOGU has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. MOGU pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MOGU quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $14.3M. MOGU's net income of -- is lower than Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, MOGU's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is 9.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MOGU is 0.94x versus 1.48x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.