MOGU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baozun, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mogu, Inc.'s net margin of -4.39%. Mogu, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.88% beat Baozun, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.58%.

Mogu, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 980.46%. On the other hand Baozun, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.46 which suggests that it could grow by 52.25%. Given that Mogu, Inc. has higher upside potential than Baozun, Inc., analysts believe Mogu, Inc. is more attractive than Baozun, Inc..

Mogu, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baozun, Inc. has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.194%.

Mogu, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baozun, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mogu, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun, Inc. pays out 0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mogu, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Baozun, Inc. quarterly revenues of $303.3M. Mogu, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Baozun, Inc.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Mogu, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baozun, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mogu, Inc. is 1.20x versus 0.12x for Baozun, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mogu, Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. Mogu, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.88% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

Mogu, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 980.46%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79.86%. Given that Mogu, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe Mogu, Inc. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..

Mogu, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

Mogu, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Mogu, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mogu, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Mogu, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Mogu, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mogu, Inc. is 1.20x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mogu, Inc.'s net margin of -16.68%. Mogu, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.88% beat NIO, Inc.'s return on equity of -205.77%.

Mogu, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 980.46%. On the other hand NIO, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could grow by 34.64%. Given that Mogu, Inc. has higher upside potential than NIO, Inc., analysts believe Mogu, Inc. is more attractive than NIO, Inc..

Mogu, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO, Inc. has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.908%.

Mogu, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mogu, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mogu, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NIO, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Mogu, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than NIO, Inc.'s net income of -$511.4M. Notably, Mogu, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mogu, Inc. is 1.20x versus 1.11x for NIO, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Mogu, Inc.'s net margin of -10.53%. Mogu, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.88% beat Uxin Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Mogu, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 980.46%. On the other hand Uxin Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1378.66%. Given that Uxin Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mogu, Inc., analysts believe Uxin Ltd. is more attractive than Mogu, Inc..

Mogu, Inc. has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.094% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin Ltd. has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.016%.

Mogu, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mogu, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mogu, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Uxin Ltd. quarterly revenues of $69.3M. Mogu, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Uxin Ltd.'s net income of -$7.3M. Notably, Mogu, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uxin Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mogu, Inc. is 1.20x versus 1.89x for Uxin Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.