BQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cango has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of --. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat Cango's return on equity of 3.59%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20147.44%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.07%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Cango.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.569%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cango quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than Cango's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango's PE ratio is 18.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 13.35x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of 42.62%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20147.44%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.13 which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 6.93x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of 23.9%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat Tuniu's return on equity of -2.93%.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20147.44%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 144.11%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Tuniu.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.678, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.838%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $26M. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than Tuniu's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 1.69x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin has a net margin of -- compared to Boqii Holding's net margin of -12.24%. Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13% beat Uxin's return on equity of --.

Boqii Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20147.44%. On the other hand Uxin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1015.42%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Uxin, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Uxin.

Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.753%.

Boqii Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boqii Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boqii Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Uxin quarterly revenues of $69.4M. Boqii Holding's net income of -- is lower than Uxin's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Boqii Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uxin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boqii Holding is 0.02x versus 2.53x for Uxin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.