CAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of 6.1% compared to China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 21.15%. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.26%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $52.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.1%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than H World Group Ltd., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than H World Group Ltd..

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.185% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.562%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.2M, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems, Inc. is 0.19x versus 4.63x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.1% compared to China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net margin of --. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.26%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.185% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.53%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.2M, which are larger than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M is higher than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.02x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.1% compared to China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net margin of -13.73%. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.26%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 395.05%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.185% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.914%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.2M, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.69x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu Corp. has a net margin of 6.1% compared to China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net margin of 9.59%. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53% beat Tuniu Corp.'s return on equity of 0.31%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.26%. On the other hand Tuniu Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 146.24%. Given that Tuniu Corp. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe Tuniu Corp. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.958, which suggesting that the stock is 4.185% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu Corp. has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.241%.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu Corp. offers a yield of 5.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.2M, which are larger than Tuniu Corp. quarterly revenues of $28.2M. China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M is higher than Tuniu Corp.'s net income of $2.7M. Notably, China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Tuniu Corp.'s PE ratio is 92.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems, Inc. is 0.19x versus 1.03x for Tuniu Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.