CAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 11.33%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 16.47%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Dorman Products.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.306%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.19x versus 1.87x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of --. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.19x versus 150.96x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 1.5%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.68%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Monro.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.745%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 8.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is higher than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Monro's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.19x versus 0.33x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 3.35% compared to China Automotive Systems's net margin of 1.23%. China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4%.

China Automotive Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.72%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.57%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Motorcar Parts of America, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Motorcar Parts of America.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, which suggesting that the stock is 160.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.368%.

China Automotive Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Automotive Systems pays 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues are $164.2M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $186.2M. China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M. Notably, China Automotive Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.19x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Automotive Systems is 0.19x versus 0.26x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.