MMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of 3.54%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.97% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 8.29%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.4%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $296.78 which suggests that it could grow by 37.7%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.594%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $240.1M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Marcus & Millichap's net income of $8.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $241.2M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 19.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 1.74x versus 0.45x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of 5.2%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.97% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 4%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.4%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $17.25 which suggests that it could grow by 63.97%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.696, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.555%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $240.1M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $872.7M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of $8.5M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $45.4M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 30.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 1.74x versus 0.82x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of -1.9%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.97% beat The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -85.25%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.4%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage has an analysts' consensus of $6.67 which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. The Real Brokerage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $240.1M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues of $350.6M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of $8.5M is higher than The Real Brokerage's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 1.74x versus 0.71x for The Real Brokerage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Marcus & Millichap's net margin of -80.75%. Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.97% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

Marcus & Millichap has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.4%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 85.64%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.643% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.784%.

Marcus & Millichap has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.59%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 28.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus & Millichap pays -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues are $240.1M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Marcus & Millichap's net income of $8.5M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap is 1.74x versus 17.85x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.