MMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of -27.43%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08% beat La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. La Rosa Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.9M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.2M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K is higher than La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.51x versus 0.04x for La Rosa Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of 6.45%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.726%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s is not.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.9M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $906.8M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.51x versus 1.30x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.81%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.482%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.9M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.51x versus 0.46x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital Corp. has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of 8.31%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08% beat Sachem Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -17.3%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.34%. On the other hand Sachem Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 41.27%. Given that Sachem Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Sachem Capital Corp. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, which suggesting that the stock is 32.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.935%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Sachem Capital Corp. offers a yield of 19.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp. pays out 52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s is not.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $193.9M, which are larger than Sachem Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $12M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K is lower than Sachem Capital Corp.'s net income of $997K. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.51x versus 2.14x for Sachem Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.