MMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of 5.28%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.02%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $385.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.458%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $401.8M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.33x versus 0.58x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaanapali Land LLC has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of -115.2%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31% beat Kaanapali Land LLC's return on equity of -4.73%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Kaanapali Land LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaanapali Land LLC, analysts believe Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is more attractive than Kaanapali Land LLC.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaanapali Land LLC has a beta of 0.107, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.326%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Kaanapali Land LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaanapali Land LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244M, which are larger than Kaanapali Land LLC quarterly revenues of $467K. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M is higher than Kaanapali Land LLC's net income of -$538K. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaanapali Land LLC's PE ratio is 94.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.33x versus 26.94x for Kaanapali Land LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of 6.45%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.07%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.507%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s is not.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $906.8M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.33x versus 1.11x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.93 which suggests that it could grow by 125.29%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.499% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244M, which are smaller than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is 1.33x versus 0.31x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.