REAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 3.42%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.01%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.39%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $350.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.25%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.247%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.5B. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.46x versus 0.63x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of -27.43%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.39%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. La Rosa Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.2M. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is higher than La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.46x versus 0.03x for La Rosa Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 6.45%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.39%. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.55%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.726%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $906.8M. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.46x versus 1.30x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital Corp. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 8.31%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Sachem Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -17.3%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.39%. On the other hand Sachem Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 42.63%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sachem Capital Corp., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Sachem Capital Corp..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.482% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.935%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital Corp. offers a yield of 19.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp. pays out 52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are larger than Sachem Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $12M. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Sachem Capital Corp.'s net income of $997K. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.46x versus 2.12x for Sachem Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.