REAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 5.28%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.02%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.93, signalling upside risk potential of 125.29%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $385.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.458%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $401.8M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.31x versus 0.58x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaanapali Land LLC has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of -115.2%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Kaanapali Land LLC's return on equity of -4.73%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.93, signalling upside risk potential of 125.29%. On the other hand Kaanapali Land LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaanapali Land LLC, analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Kaanapali Land LLC.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaanapali Land LLC has a beta of 0.107, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.326%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaanapali Land LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaanapali Land LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are larger than Kaanapali Land LLC quarterly revenues of $467K. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is higher than Kaanapali Land LLC's net income of -$538K. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaanapali Land LLC's PE ratio is 94.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.31x versus 26.94x for Kaanapali Land LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 5.46%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.93, signalling upside risk potential of 125.29%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.499%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays out 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244M. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.31x versus 1.33x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a net margin of -0.05% compared to The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net margin of 6.45%. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76% beat Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.93, signalling upside risk potential of 125.29%. On the other hand Newmark Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.07%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 3.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.507%.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc. pays out 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues are $568.5M, which are smaller than Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $906.8M. The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K is lower than Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M. Notably, The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Real Brokerage, Inc. is 0.31x versus 1.11x for Newmark Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.