NMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -27.43%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, which suggesting that the stock is 91.726% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. La Rosa Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.2M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.03x for La Rosa Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 0.12%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.08%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.03%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, which suggesting that the stock is 91.726% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.225%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays out 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s is not.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.9M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $240K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.30x versus 1.54x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 62.39%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, which suggesting that the stock is 91.726% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.482%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.46x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital Corp. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 8.31%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Sachem Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -17.3%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand Sachem Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 42.63%. Given that Sachem Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe Sachem Capital Corp. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.917, which suggesting that the stock is 91.726% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.935%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Sachem Capital Corp. offers a yield of 19.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp. pays out 52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than Sachem Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $12M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than Sachem Capital Corp.'s net income of $997K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.74x while Sachem Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.30x versus 2.12x for Sachem Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.