NMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 3.42%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.01%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $381.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.926, which suggesting that the stock is 92.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.407%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $222.4M. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.31x versus 0.68x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -27.43%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -188.78%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings Corp., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings Corp..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.926, which suggesting that the stock is 92.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. La Rosa Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.2M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.31x versus 0.01x for La Rosa Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.93 which suggests that it could grow by 67.37%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.926, which suggesting that the stock is 92.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.836%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.31x versus 0.42x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital Corp. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 8.31%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Sachem Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -17.3%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand Sachem Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 42.63%. Given that Sachem Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe Sachem Capital Corp. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.926, which suggesting that the stock is 92.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.213, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.289%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Sachem Capital Corp. offers a yield of 19.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital Corp. pays out 52.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than Sachem Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of $12M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than Sachem Capital Corp.'s net income of $997K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.84x while Sachem Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.31x versus 2.12x for Sachem Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.