NMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 5.28%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.02%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.07%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $385.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.458%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s net income of $401.8M. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.12x while Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.11x versus 0.58x for Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaanapali Land LLC has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -115.2%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Kaanapali Land LLC's return on equity of -4.73%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.07%. On the other hand Kaanapali Land LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaanapali Land LLC, analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Kaanapali Land LLC.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaanapali Land LLC has a beta of 0.107, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.326%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Kaanapali Land LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaanapali Land LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than Kaanapali Land LLC quarterly revenues of $467K. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than Kaanapali Land LLC's net income of -$538K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.12x while Kaanapali Land LLC's PE ratio is 94.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.11x versus 26.94x for Kaanapali Land LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of 5.46%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.31%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.07%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Newmark Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, Inc., analysts believe Newmark Group, Inc. is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap, Inc. has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.499%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap, Inc. pays out 163.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s is not.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s net income of $13.3M. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.12x while Marcus & Millichap, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.11x versus 1.33x for Marcus & Millichap, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a net margin of 6.45% compared to Newmark Group, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Newmark Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.78% beat The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.76%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.00, signalling upside risk potential of 39.07%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.93 which suggests that it could grow by 125.29%. Given that The Real Brokerage, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, Inc., analysts believe The Real Brokerage, Inc. is more attractive than Newmark Group, Inc..

Newmark Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage, Inc. has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

Newmark Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. The Real Brokerage, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group, Inc. pays 34.82% of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $906.8M, which are larger than The Real Brokerage, Inc. quarterly revenues of $568.5M. Newmark Group, Inc.'s net income of $58.5M is higher than The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s net income of -$280K. Notably, Newmark Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.12x while The Real Brokerage, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group, Inc. is 1.11x versus 0.31x for The Real Brokerage, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.