COMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Compass's net margin of -12.52%. Compass's return on equity of -47.6% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Compass has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.88%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Compass has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Compass is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Compass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Compass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Compass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Compass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Compass's net income of -$1.7M is higher than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Compass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compass is 0.58x versus 0.19x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Compass's net margin of 2.59%. Compass's return on equity of -47.6% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43%.

Compass has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.88%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.37%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Compass, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Compass.

Compass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.717%.

Compass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Compass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Compass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $685.9M. Compass's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Compass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 43.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compass is 0.58x versus 1.07x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Offerpad Solutions has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Compass's net margin of -6.51%. Compass's return on equity of -47.6% beat Offerpad Solutions's return on equity of -67.37%.

Compass has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.88%. On the other hand Offerpad Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.19%. Given that Compass has higher upside potential than Offerpad Solutions, analysts believe Compass is more attractive than Offerpad Solutions.

Compass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Offerpad Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Compass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Offerpad Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Compass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Offerpad Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Compass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Offerpad Solutions quarterly revenues of $208.1M. Compass's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Offerpad Solutions's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, Compass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Offerpad Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compass is 0.58x versus 0.10x for Offerpad Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of -0.11% compared to Compass's net margin of -80.75%. Compass's return on equity of -47.6% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

Compass has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.88%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.84%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Compass, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Compass.

Compass has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.031%.

Compass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 28.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Compass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend.

Compass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Compass's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Compass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 37.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Compass is 0.58x versus 1.94x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.