OPAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of -6.51% compared to Offerpad Solutions's net margin of 2.64%. Offerpad Solutions's return on equity of -67.37% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.41%.

Offerpad Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.19%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $311.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.32%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than Offerpad Solutions, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than Offerpad Solutions.

Offerpad Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.278%.

Offerpad Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Offerpad Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Offerpad Solutions quarterly revenues are $208.1M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Offerpad Solutions's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $155.1M. Notably, Offerpad Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 25.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Offerpad Solutions is 0.10x versus 0.54x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of -6.51% compared to Offerpad Solutions's net margin of -12.52%. Offerpad Solutions's return on equity of -67.37% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Offerpad Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.19%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Offerpad Solutions has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Offerpad Solutions is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Offerpad Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Offerpad Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Offerpad Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Offerpad Solutions quarterly revenues are $208.1M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Offerpad Solutions's net income of -$13.5M is lower than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Offerpad Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Offerpad Solutions is 0.10x versus 0.19x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of -6.51% compared to Offerpad Solutions's net margin of 2.59%. Offerpad Solutions's return on equity of -67.37% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43%.

Offerpad Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.19%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.37%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Offerpad Solutions, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Offerpad Solutions.

Offerpad Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.717%.

Offerpad Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Offerpad Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Offerpad Solutions quarterly revenues are $208.1M, which are smaller than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $685.9M. Offerpad Solutions's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Offerpad Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 43.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Offerpad Solutions is 0.10x versus 1.07x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of -6.51% compared to Offerpad Solutions's net margin of -80.75%. Offerpad Solutions's return on equity of -67.37% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

Offerpad Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.19%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.84%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Offerpad Solutions, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Offerpad Solutions.

Offerpad Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.031%.

Offerpad Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 28.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Offerpad Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend.

Offerpad Solutions quarterly revenues are $208.1M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Offerpad Solutions's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Offerpad Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 37.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Offerpad Solutions is 0.10x versus 1.94x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.