LXU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 4.58% compared to LSB Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 8.36%. LSB Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.14% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.02%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $80.30 which suggests that it could grow by 4.46%. Given that LSB Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals Co., analysts believe LSB Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Commercial Metals Co..

LSB Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.509%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. LSB Industries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LSB Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $155.4M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. LSB Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is lower than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M. Notably, LSB Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 198.25x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 19.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LSB Industries, Inc. is 1.14x versus 1.09x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.58% compared to LSB Industries, Inc.'s net margin of -0.66%. LSB Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.14% beat Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.28%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.02%. On the other hand Mativ Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 51.45%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LSB Industries, Inc., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LSB Industries, Inc..

LSB Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.743%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mativ Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. LSB Industries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays out 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LSB Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $155.4M, which are smaller than Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $513.7M. LSB Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is higher than Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, LSB Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 198.25x while Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LSB Industries, Inc. is 1.14x versus 0.33x for Mativ Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 4.58% compared to LSB Industries, Inc.'s net margin of --. LSB Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.14% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.02%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could fall by -3.96%. Given that LSB Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe LSB Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..

LSB Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.769% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LSB Industries, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LSB Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $155.4M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. LSB Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, LSB Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 198.25x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LSB Industries, Inc. is 1.14x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.