MATV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alto Ingredients, Inc. has a net margin of 21.77% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.9%. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -65% beat Alto Ingredients, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.14%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 59.95%. On the other hand Alto Ingredients, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 75.62%. Given that Alto Ingredients, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mativ Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Alto Ingredients, Inc. is more attractive than Mativ Holdings, Inc..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alto Ingredients, Inc. has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.163%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Alto Ingredients, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Alto Ingredients, Inc. pays out 2.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $463.1M, which are larger than Alto Ingredients, Inc. quarterly revenues of $241M. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $100.8M is higher than Alto Ingredients, Inc.'s net income of $14.2M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Alto Ingredients, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.32x versus 0.19x for Alto Ingredients, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 21.77% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.04%. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -65% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 59.95%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $121.50 which suggests that it could fall by -5.83%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $463.1M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $100.8M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.32x versus 0.63x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LSB Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 21.77% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.58%. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -65% beat LSB Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.14%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 59.95%. On the other hand LSB Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.06%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LSB Industries, Inc., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LSB Industries, Inc..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LSB Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.719%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. LSB Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. LSB Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $463.1M, which are larger than LSB Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $155.4M. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $100.8M is higher than LSB Industries, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while LSB Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 198.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.32x versus 1.24x for LSB Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 21.77% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1.25%. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -65% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.04%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 59.95%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.98%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. has a beta of 2.223, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.303%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $463.1M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $352.8M. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $100.8M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.32x versus 0.35x for Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.