MATV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -0.66% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.28% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.08%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.83%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.797% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $513.7M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 38.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.33x versus 1.20x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -0.66% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.28% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.08%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Mativ Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Mativ Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.797% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $513.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.33x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -0.66% compared to Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -73.28% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 51.08%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Mativ Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Mativ Holdings, Inc..

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.797% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings, Inc. pays 44.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $513.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Mativ Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings, Inc. is 0.33x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.