MATV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -4.17% compared to Mativ Holdings's net margin of -0.63%. Mativ Holdings's return on equity of 12.47% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Mativ Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mativ Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Mativ Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Mativ Holdings has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Mativ Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Mativ Holdings pays -17.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings quarterly revenues are $498.5M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Mativ Holdings's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Mativ Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings is 0.30x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innospec has a net margin of -4.17% compared to Mativ Holdings's net margin of 7.53%. Mativ Holdings's return on equity of 12.47% beat Innospec's return on equity of 12.17%.

Mativ Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.62%. Given that Mativ Holdings has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Mativ Holdings is more attractive than Innospec.

Mativ Holdings has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.261%.

Mativ Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Mativ Holdings pays -17.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mativ Holdings quarterly revenues are $498.5M, which are larger than Innospec quarterly revenues of $443.4M. Mativ Holdings's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Innospec's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Mativ Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Innospec's PE ratio is 18.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings is 0.30x versus 1.44x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -4.17% compared to Mativ Holdings's net margin of --. Mativ Holdings's return on equity of 12.47% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Mativ Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Mativ Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Mativ Holdings.

Mativ Holdings has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Mativ Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings pays -17.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mativ Holdings quarterly revenues are $498.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Mativ Holdings's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Mativ Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings is 0.30x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -4.17% compared to Mativ Holdings's net margin of --. Mativ Holdings's return on equity of 12.47% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Mativ Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.36%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Mativ Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Mativ Holdings.

Mativ Holdings has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Mativ Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mativ Holdings pays -17.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mativ Holdings quarterly revenues are $498.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Mativ Holdings's net income of -$20.8M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Mativ Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mativ Holdings is 0.30x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.