KOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chemours has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -0.29%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 4.67%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 119.88%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $17.15 which suggests that it could grow by 55.06%. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than The Chemours.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.582%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. The Chemours offers a yield of 9.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Chemours's is not.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are smaller than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$4M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.14x while The Chemours's PE ratio is 58.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.28x versus 0.29x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 119.88%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 193.53%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.14x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.28x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -8.98%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -9.5%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 119.88%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 120.39%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.222%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $356M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$32M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.14x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.28x versus 0.15x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 119.88%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 142.25%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.14x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.28x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.