HUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Balchem has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 13.99%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Balchem's return on equity of 11.53%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $17.15, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Balchem has an analysts' consensus of $199.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.91%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than Balchem, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than Balchem.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Balchem has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.813%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.75%. Balchem offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem pays out 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Balchem quarterly revenues of $240M. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Balchem's net income of $33.6M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Balchem's PE ratio is 40.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.37x versus 5.43x for Balchem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Chemours has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -0.57%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $17.15, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.84%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.839, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.857%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.75%. The Chemours offers a yield of 8.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$8M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chemours's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.37x versus 0.31x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $17.15, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 274.23%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.75%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.37x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $17.15, signalling upside risk potential of 32.98%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 143.63%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 15.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.75%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.37x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.