3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Sell
24
LUCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.78
Seasonality move
:
2.91%
Day range:
$8.11 - $8.80
52-week range:
$7.66 - $14.92
Dividend yield:
2.51%
P/E ratio:
19.11x
P/S ratio:
1.11x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
621.7K
Avg. volume:
347.1K
1-year change:
-20.13%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$1.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
|
$278.7M | -$0.15 | 3.65% | -96.12% | $13.95 |
|
DSHK
Drive Shack
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HWH
HWH International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
|
$778.9M | $0.37 | 12.81% | 41.35% | $38.04 |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness
|
$328.3M | $0.75 | 9.72% | 39.51% | $109.45 |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
|
$80.5M | $0.39 | 1.09% | 151.39% | $13.30 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
|
$8.77 | $13.95 | $1.3B | 19.11x | $0.06 | 2.51% | 1.11x |
|
DSHK
Drive Shack
|
$0.11 | -- | $21.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
HWH
HWH International
|
$1.10 | -- | $7.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.15x |
|
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
|
$28.45 | $38.04 | $6.2B | 29.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.25x |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness
|
$92.81 | $109.45 | $7.8B | 43.78x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.53x |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
|
$8.14 | $13.30 | $283.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.84x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
|
107.22% | 2.541 | 84.27% | 0.42x |
|
DSHK
Drive Shack
|
-- | 3.372 | -- | -- |
|
HWH
HWH International
|
143.72% | 2.641 | 6.25% | 0.90x |
|
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
|
35.74% | 2.369 | 23.11% | 0.18x |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness
|
111.3% | 2.030 | 26.75% | 1.78x |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
|
270.78% | 4.436 | 177.47% | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment
|
$144.1M | $62.8M | 0.22% | -203.93% | 23.85% | $61.1M |
|
DSHK
Drive Shack
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HWH
HWH International
|
$159.9K | -$327.5K | -- | -- | -150.12% | -$277.1K |
|
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings
|
$335.1M | $107.7M | 4.91% | 8.25% | 15.25% | $41.4M |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness
|
$150.6M | $79.2M | 9.41% | -- | 30.83% | $110.9M |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness
|
$51.5M | $3M | -81.54% | -- | 11.98% | $5M |
Lucky Strike Entertainment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or DSHK?
Drive Shack has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of --. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Drive Shack's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment42.39% $0.07 $1.2B DSHKDrive Shack-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or DSHK?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 59.07%. On the other hand Drive Shack has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1743.32%. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment7 2 0 DSHKDrive Shack0 0 0 -
Is LUCK or DSHK More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drive Shack has a beta of 2.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.184%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or DSHK?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Drive Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Drive Shack pays out -3.32% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or DSHK?
Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than Drive Shack quarterly revenues of --. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is higher than Drive Shack's net income of --. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Drive Shack's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.11x versus 0.03x for Drive Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment1.11x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M DSHKDrive Shack0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or HWH?
HWH International has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of -158.74%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat HWH International's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment42.39% $0.07 $1.2B HWHHWH International46.27% -$0.03 $981.2K -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 59.07%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than HWH International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment7 2 0 HWHHWH International0 0 0 -
Is LUCK or HWH More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $345.5K. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is higher than HWH International's net income of -$548.5K. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.11x versus 3.15x for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment1.11x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M HWHHWH International3.15x -- $345.5K -$548.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or LTH?
Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of 10.78%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 8.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment42.39% $0.07 $1.2B LTHLife Time Group Holdings47.46% $0.34 $4.3B -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or LTH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 59.07%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.04 which suggests that it could grow by 33.7%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment7 2 0 LTHLife Time Group Holdings8 3 0 -
Is LUCK or LTH More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or LTH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or LTH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $706M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 29.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.11x versus 2.25x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment1.11x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M LTHLife Time Group Holdings2.25x 29.64x $706M $76.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or PLNT?
Planet Fitness has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of 15.13%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment42.39% $0.07 $1.2B PLNTPlanet Fitness54.42% $0.50 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 59.07%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $109.45 which suggests that it could grow by 17.93%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Planet Fitness.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment7 2 0 PLNTPlanet Fitness9 3 0 -
Is LUCK or PLNT More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.885%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $276.7M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $41.9M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 43.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.11x versus 6.53x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment1.11x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M PLNTPlanet Fitness6.53x 43.78x $276.7M $41.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or XPOF?
Xponential Fitness has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment's net margin of -1.76%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93% beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment42.39% $0.07 $1.2B XPOFXponential Fitness66.93% -$0.10 $43.4M -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a consensus price target of $13.95, signalling upside risk potential of 59.07%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.30 which suggests that it could grow by 63.39%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment7 2 0 XPOFXponential Fitness4 5 0 -
Is LUCK or XPOF More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues are $339.9M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $13.3M is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment is 1.11x versus 0.84x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment1.11x 19.11x $339.9M $13.3M XPOFXponential Fitness0.84x -- $76.9M -$1.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
