Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
33
LUCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.88
Seasonality move
:
4.96%
Day range:
$8.75 - $8.96
52-week range:
$6.96 - $13.25
Dividend yield:
2.53%
P/E ratio:
19.11x
P/S ratio:
1.04x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
221.3K
Avg. volume:
328.6K
1-year change:
-18.44%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.41
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.
|
$355.6M | $0.19 | 4.58% | -68.69% | $13.25 |
|
HWH
HWH International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
|
$311.4M | $0.70 | 7.25% | 39.44% | $130.41 |
|
TRUG
TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
|
$6M | -- | -11.81% | -- | $1.00 |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
|
$72.8M | $0.18 | -11.77% | -97.49% | $10.90 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.
|
$8.89 | $13.25 | $1.2B | 19.11x | $0.06 | 2.53% | 1.04x |
|
HWH
HWH International, Inc.
|
$1.49 | -- | $9.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.46x |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
|
$109.07 | $130.41 | $9.1B | 44.58x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.12x |
|
TRUG
TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.80 | $1.00 | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
|
$8.74 | $10.90 | $307.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.95x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.
|
106.57% | 0.941 | 203.18% | 0.19x |
|
HWH
HWH International, Inc.
|
28.08% | 4.585 | 6.22% | 1.39x |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
|
108.05% | 0.428 | 30.35% | 1.90x |
|
TRUG
TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
|
47.88% | -2.384 | 112.01% | 1.15x |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
|
142.66% | 2.866 | 126.45% | 0.72x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.
|
$64.1M | $27.9M | -1.6% | -203.93% | 9.54% | -$277.5M |
|
HWH
HWH International, Inc.
|
$118.5K | -$201.4K | -27.04% | -44.9% | -97.39% | -$436.5K |
|
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
|
$131.9M | $106.6M | 8.59% | -- | 32.26% | $76.7M |
|
TRUG
TruGolf Holdings, Inc.
|
$2.8M | -$1.1M | -181.17% | -- | -27.12% | -$1.5M |
|
XPOF
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
|
$57.9M | $23.4M | -34.78% | -- | 29.74% | $7.8M |
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or HWH?
HWH International, Inc. has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net margin of -144.87%. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s return on equity of -203.93% beat HWH International, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.21.92% -$0.12 $3B HWHHWH International, Inc.57.3% -$0.04 $4M -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 49.04%. On the other hand HWH International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has higher upside potential than HWH International, Inc., analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is more attractive than HWH International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.7 3 0 HWHHWH International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LUCK or HWH More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. HWH International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. pays 334.77% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or HWH?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. quarterly revenues are $292.3M, which are larger than HWH International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.8K. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net income of -$13.8M is lower than HWH International, Inc.'s net income of -$299.6K. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while HWH International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is 1.04x versus 8.46x for HWH International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.1.04x 19.11x $292.3M -$13.8M HWHHWH International, Inc.8.46x -- $206.8K -$299.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or PLNT?
Planet Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net margin of 17.92%. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s return on equity of -203.93% beat Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.21.92% -$0.12 $3B PLNTPlanet Fitness, Inc.39.92% $0.70 $2.4B -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 49.04%. On the other hand Planet Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.41 which suggests that it could grow by 19.57%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.7 3 0 PLNTPlanet Fitness, Inc.12 2 0 -
Is LUCK or PLNT More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.609%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Planet Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. pays 334.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or PLNT?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. quarterly revenues are $292.3M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $330.3M. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net income of -$13.8M is lower than Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Planet Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is 1.04x versus 7.12x for Planet Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.1.04x 19.11x $292.3M -$13.8M PLNTPlanet Fitness, Inc.7.12x 44.58x $330.3M $59.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or TRUG?
TruGolf Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net margin of -177.26%. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s return on equity of -203.93% beat TruGolf Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.21.92% -$0.12 $3B TRUGTruGolf Holdings, Inc.69.35% -$4.87 $12M -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or TRUG?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 49.04%. On the other hand TruGolf Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2414.14%. Given that TruGolf Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp., analysts believe TruGolf Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.7 3 0 TRUGTruGolf Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LUCK or TRUG More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TruGolf Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or TRUG?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. TruGolf Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. pays 334.77% of its earnings as a dividend. TruGolf Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or TRUG?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. quarterly revenues are $292.3M, which are larger than TruGolf Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net income of -$13.8M is lower than TruGolf Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$7.3M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while TruGolf Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is 1.04x versus 0.32x for TruGolf Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.1.04x 19.11x $292.3M -$13.8M TRUGTruGolf Holdings, Inc.0.32x -- $4.1M -$7.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns LUCK or XPOF?
Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of -4.72% compared to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net margin of -8.56%. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s return on equity of -203.93% beat Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.21.92% -$0.12 $3B XPOFXponential Fitness, Inc.73.39% -$0.18 $176M -
What do Analysts Say About LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a consensus price target of $13.25, signalling upside risk potential of 49.04%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could grow by 24.71%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has higher upside potential than Xponential Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is more attractive than Xponential Fitness, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.7 3 0 XPOFXponential Fitness, Inc.5 5 0 -
Is LUCK or XPOF More Risky?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Xponential Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. pays 334.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays out 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LUCK or XPOF?
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. quarterly revenues are $292.3M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.8M. Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s net income of -$13.8M is lower than Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.11x while Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corp. is 1.04x versus 0.95x for Xponential Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corp.1.04x 19.11x $292.3M -$13.8M XPOFXponential Fitness, Inc.0.95x -- $78.8M -$6.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
