HWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of -158.74% compared to HWH International's net margin of 5.6%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 6.46%.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.19%. Given that Life Time Group Holdings has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Life Time Group Holdings is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $345.5K, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $663.3M. HWH International's net income of -$548.5K is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $37.2M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 41.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 3.18x versus 2.47x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -158.74% compared to HWH International's net margin of 9.43%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 68.92%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $345.5K, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $300.1M. HWH International's net income of -$548.5K is lower than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $28.3M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 3.18x versus 1.15x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -158.74% compared to HWH International's net margin of 13.83%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $109.96 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that Planet Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Planet Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.617%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $345.5K, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $340.5M. HWH International's net income of -$548.5K is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $47.1M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 48.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 3.18x versus 7.04x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -158.74% compared to HWH International's net margin of -51.4%. HWH International's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

HWH International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $14.30 which suggests that it could grow by 91.95%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

HWH International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HWH International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HWH International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

HWH International quarterly revenues are $345.5K, which are smaller than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $83.8M. HWH International's net income of -$548.5K is higher than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$43.1M. Notably, HWH International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HWH International is 3.18x versus 0.74x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.