XPOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International has a net margin of -16.64% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of -158.74%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.19%. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than HWH International.

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $80.5M, which are larger than HWH International quarterly revenues of $345.5K. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M is lower than HWH International's net income of -$548.5K. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 1.42x versus -- for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of -16.64% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 5.97%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 6.1%.

Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.19%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $28.54 which suggests that it could grow by 27.92%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings.

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $80.5M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $693.2M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 32.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 1.42x versus 1.83x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -16.64% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 8.88%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.19%. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 67.95%. Given that Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher upside potential than Xponential Fitness, analysts believe Lucky Strike Entertainment is more attractive than Xponential Fitness.

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $80.5M, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $260.2M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M is lower than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $23.1M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 1.42x versus 1.33x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -16.64% compared to Xponential Fitness's net margin of 14.38%. Xponential Fitness's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

Xponential Fitness has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 38.19%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $105.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.24%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

Xponential Fitness has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness pays -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues are $80.5M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $292.2M. Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $42M. Notably, Xponential Fitness's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 53.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness is 1.42x versus 7.60x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.