XPOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International, Inc. has a net margin of -8.56% compared to Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of -144.87%. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat HWH International, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.9%.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.90, signalling upside risk potential of 56.61%. On the other hand HWH International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xponential Fitness, Inc. has higher upside potential than HWH International, Inc., analysts believe Xponential Fitness, Inc. is more attractive than HWH International, Inc..

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are larger than HWH International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.8K. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than HWH International, Inc.'s net income of -$299.6K. Notably, Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HWH International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness, Inc. is 0.76x versus 10.10x for HWH International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -8.56% compared to Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of 13.09%. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.90, signalling upside risk potential of 56.61%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.91 which suggests that it could grow by 50.2%. Given that Xponential Fitness, Inc. has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Xponential Fitness, Inc. is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc..

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782.6M. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $102.4M. Notably, Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness, Inc. is 0.76x versus 2.04x for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of -8.56% compared to Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of 17.92%. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.90, signalling upside risk potential of 56.61%. On the other hand Planet Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $128.94 which suggests that it could grow by 17.86%. Given that Xponential Fitness, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Xponential Fitness, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.609%.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are smaller than Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $330.3M. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xponential Fitness, Inc. is 0.76x versus 7.15x for Planet Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.