FXLV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 13.09%. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27172.73%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.18 which suggests that it could grow by 35.29%. Given that F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc., analysts believe F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc..

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782.6M. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $102.4M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 2.28x for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.92%. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27172.73%. On the other hand Planet Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.2%. Given that F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.047%.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $330.3M. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 6.01x for Planet Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -8.56%. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27172.73%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could grow by 30.23%. Given that F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Xponential Fitness, Inc., analysts believe F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Xponential Fitness, Inc..

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays out 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

F45 Training Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.8M. F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.91x for Xponential Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.