PLNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HWH International, Inc. has a net margin of 17.92% compared to Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of -144.87%. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat HWH International, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.9%.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $130.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.61%. On the other hand HWH International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Planet Fitness, Inc. has higher upside potential than HWH International, Inc., analysts believe Planet Fitness, Inc. is more attractive than HWH International, Inc..

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, which suggesting that the stock is 27.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $330.3M, which are larger than HWH International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.8K. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M is higher than HWH International, Inc.'s net income of -$299.6K. Notably, Planet Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.94x while HWH International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness, Inc. is 7.18x versus 9.88x for HWH International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 17.92% compared to Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of 13.09%. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.46%.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $130.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.61%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.91 which suggests that it could grow by 49.47%. Given that Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, which suggesting that the stock is 27.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $330.3M, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782.6M. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M is lower than Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $102.4M. Notably, Planet Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.94x while Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness, Inc. is 7.18x versus 2.05x for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a net margin of 17.92% compared to Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net margin of -8.56%. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a consensus price target of $130.41, signalling upside risk potential of 18.61%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could grow by 25.29%. Given that Xponential Fitness, Inc. has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, Inc., analysts believe Xponential Fitness, Inc. is more attractive than Planet Fitness, Inc..

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 1.276, which suggesting that the stock is 27.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Fitness, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Fitness, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc. pays out 5.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Planet Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues are $330.3M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78.8M. Planet Fitness, Inc.'s net income of $59.2M is higher than Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Planet Fitness, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 44.94x while Xponential Fitness, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Fitness, Inc. is 7.18x versus 0.94x for Xponential Fitness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.