GHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ambow Education Holding has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of --.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -19.46%. On the other hand Ambow Education Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.103%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Ambow Education Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ambow Education Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Ambow Education Holding's net income of --. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Ambow Education Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.89x versus 0.66x for Ambow Education Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 5.73%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -19.46%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.32%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.212%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 62.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.89x versus 1.41x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -126.08%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -19.46%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.225%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.89x versus 0.15x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 20.51%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -19.46%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.12%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 9.014% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.162%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.72%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.83x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.89x versus 2.79x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.