MYND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graham Holdings Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net margin of 9.81%. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.08% beat Graham Holdings Co.'s return on equity of 16.78%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graham Holdings Co. has an analysts' consensus of $945.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.78%. Given that Graham Holdings Co. has higher upside potential than Mynd.AI, Inc., analysts believe Graham Holdings Co. is more attractive than Mynd.AI, Inc..

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham Holdings Co. has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.454%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graham Holdings Co. offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Mynd.AI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings Co. pays out 4.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mynd.AI, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graham Holdings Co. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Graham Holdings Co.'s net income of $125.5M. Notably, Mynd.AI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graham Holdings Co.'s PE ratio is 6.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.AI, Inc. is 0.14x versus 0.99x for Graham Holdings Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.08% beat Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s return on equity of 7.92%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.60 which suggests that it could grow by 20.47%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has higher upside potential than Mynd.AI, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services Corp. is more attractive than Mynd.AI, Inc..

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services Corp. has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.034000000000001%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mynd.AI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mynd.AI, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services Corp. quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s net income of $3.8M. Notably, Mynd.AI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services Corp.'s PE ratio is 48.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.AI, Inc. is 0.14x versus 1.39x for Lincoln Educational Services Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net margin of 6.23%. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.08% beat Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.34%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $231.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.27%. Given that Grand Canyon Education, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mynd.AI, Inc., analysts believe Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is more attractive than Mynd.AI, Inc..

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education, Inc. has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.38%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mynd.AI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mynd.AI, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education, Inc. quarterly revenues of $261.1M. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, Mynd.AI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.AI, Inc. is 0.14x versus 4.00x for Grand Canyon Education, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net margin of 18.81%. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.08% beat Perdoceo Education Corp.'s return on equity of 16.09%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perdoceo Education Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.94%. Given that Perdoceo Education Corp. has higher upside potential than Mynd.AI, Inc., analysts believe Perdoceo Education Corp. is more attractive than Mynd.AI, Inc..

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education Corp. has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.395%.

Mynd.AI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education Corp. offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Mynd.AI, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education Corp. pays out 21.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mynd.AI, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education Corp. quarterly revenues of $211.9M. Mynd.AI, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education Corp.'s net income of $39.9M. Notably, Mynd.AI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mynd.AI, Inc. is 0.14x versus 2.34x for Perdoceo Education Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.