PRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 16.94%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $119.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.806%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $176.4M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $447.7M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.43x versus 2.25x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 27.99%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $194.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.623%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $176.4M, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $292.6M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.43x versus 4.79x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of --. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -68.39%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.812%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $176.4M, which are larger than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M is higher than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.43x versus 0.11x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 17.83% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 8.14%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $112.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.59%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, which suggesting that the stock is 3.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.472%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $176.4M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $311.5M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.43x versus 1.58x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.