ATGE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Adtalem Global Education's net margin of 5.73%. Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Adtalem Global Education has a consensus price target of $119.67, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 50.19%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.691%.

Adtalem Global Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adtalem Global Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues are $447.7M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Adtalem Global Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 46.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtalem Global Education is 2.25x versus 1.04x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Adtalem Global Education's net margin of 27.99%. Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89%.

Adtalem Global Education has a consensus price target of $119.67, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $194.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Adtalem Global Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Adtalem Global Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.623%.

Adtalem Global Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adtalem Global Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues are $447.7M, which are larger than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $292.6M. Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M. Notably, Adtalem Global Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtalem Global Education is 2.25x versus 4.79x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Adtalem Global Education's net margin of 8.14%. Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75%.

Adtalem Global Education has a consensus price target of $119.67, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $112.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.59%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.472%.

Adtalem Global Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Adtalem Global Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues are $447.7M, which are larger than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $311.5M. Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M. Notably, Adtalem Global Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtalem Global Education is 2.25x versus 1.58x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Technical Institute has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Adtalem Global Education's net margin of 11%. Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12% beat Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78%.

Adtalem Global Education has a consensus price target of $119.67, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Universal Technical Institute has an analysts' consensus of $32.60 which suggests that it could grow by 21.24%. Given that Adtalem Global Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Adtalem Global Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.806% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.058%.

Adtalem Global Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Technical Institute offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adtalem Global Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute pays out 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues are $447.7M, which are larger than Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M is higher than Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M. Notably, Adtalem Global Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Universal Technical Institute's PE ratio is 27.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtalem Global Education is 2.25x versus 1.96x for Universal Technical Institute. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.