LOPE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 27.99% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 16.94%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $194.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $119.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Adtalem Global Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Adtalem Global Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, which suggesting that the stock is 21.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.806%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $292.6M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $447.7M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M is higher than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.79x versus 2.25x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 27.99% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 17.83%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $194.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.28%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, which suggesting that the stock is 21.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.591%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $292.6M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M is higher than Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 11.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.79x versus 2.43x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 27.99% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 8.14%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $194.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $112.33 which suggests that it could grow by 40.59%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, which suggesting that the stock is 21.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.472%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $292.6M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $311.5M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.79x versus 1.58x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Technical Institute has a net margin of 27.99% compared to Grand Canyon Education's net margin of 11%. Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89% beat Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.78%.

Grand Canyon Education has a consensus price target of $194.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Universal Technical Institute has an analysts' consensus of $32.60 which suggests that it could grow by 21.24%. Given that Universal Technical Institute has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Universal Technical Institute is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, which suggesting that the stock is 21.623% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.058%.

Grand Canyon Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Technical Institute offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand Canyon Education pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute pays out 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues are $292.6M, which are larger than Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M is higher than Universal Technical Institute's net income of $22.2M. Notably, Grand Canyon Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Universal Technical Institute's PE ratio is 27.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand Canyon Education is 4.79x versus 1.96x for Universal Technical Institute. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.