STRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 16.94%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 15.12%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $112.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.59%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $119.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.806%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $447.7M. Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $75.9M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.58x versus 2.25x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 5.73%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.86%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $112.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.59%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $22.33 which suggests that it could grow by 50.19%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.691%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $119.4M. Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 46.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.58x versus 1.04x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 27.99%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.89%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $112.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.59%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $194.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.623%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are larger than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $292.6M. Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $81.9M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.58x versus 4.79x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 8.14% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 17.83%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.75% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $112.33, signalling upside risk potential of 40.59%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.28%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.472% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.591%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $176.4M. Strategic Education's net income of $25.3M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $31.5M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.11x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 11.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.58x versus 2.43x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.