FNV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gatos Silver has a net margin of 55.39% compared to Franco-Nevada's net margin of --. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of -10.03% beat Gatos Silver's return on equity of --.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.23%. On the other hand Gatos Silver has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 6.38%. Given that Franco-Nevada has higher upside potential than Gatos Silver, analysts believe Franco-Nevada is more attractive than Gatos Silver.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gatos Silver has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Franco-Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Gatos Silver offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franco-Nevada pays -49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Gatos Silver pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franco-Nevada quarterly revenues are $275.7M, which are larger than Gatos Silver quarterly revenues of --. Franco-Nevada's net income of $152.7M is higher than Gatos Silver's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Franco-Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gatos Silver's PE ratio is 31.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada is 22.36x versus -- for Gatos Silver. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 55.39% compared to Franco-Nevada's net margin of -124.64%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of -10.03% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.23%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 158.74%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Franco-Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Franco-Nevada pays -49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franco-Nevada quarterly revenues are $275.7M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Franco-Nevada's net income of $152.7M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Franco-Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada is 22.36x versus 24.56x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 55.39% compared to Franco-Nevada's net margin of -3.98%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of -10.03% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4%.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.23%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.63 which suggests that it could grow by 75.36%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.457%.

Franco-Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franco-Nevada pays -49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franco-Nevada quarterly revenues are $275.7M, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Franco-Nevada's net income of $152.7M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Franco-Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada is 22.36x versus 2.08x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 55.39% compared to Franco-Nevada's net margin of --. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of -10.03% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $148.02, signalling upside risk potential of 16.23%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.62 which suggests that it could grow by 245.86%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Franco-Nevada, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.27%.

Franco-Nevada has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franco-Nevada pays -49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Franco-Nevada quarterly revenues are $275.7M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Franco-Nevada's net income of $152.7M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Franco-Nevada's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franco-Nevada is 22.36x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.