FINV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 19.69% compared to FinVolution Group's net margin of --. FinVolution Group's return on equity of 16.39% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

FinVolution Group has a consensus price target of $11.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.41%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FinVolution Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FinVolution Group pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FinVolution Group quarterly revenues are $480.4M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. FinVolution Group's net income of $94.6M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, FinVolution Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.88x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FinVolution Group is 1.25x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lufax Holding has a net margin of 19.69% compared to FinVolution Group's net margin of -19.94%. FinVolution Group's return on equity of 16.39% beat Lufax Holding's return on equity of -3.75%.

FinVolution Group has a consensus price target of $11.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.41%. On the other hand Lufax Holding has an analysts' consensus of $2.87 which suggests that it could fall by -1.85%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Lufax Holding, analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Lufax Holding.

FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lufax Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FinVolution Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Lufax Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.37 per share. FinVolution Group pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Lufax Holding pays out 161.86% of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lufax Holding's is not.

FinVolution Group quarterly revenues are $480.4M, which are smaller than Lufax Holding quarterly revenues of $612.8M. FinVolution Group's net income of $94.6M is higher than Lufax Holding's net income of -$122.2M. Notably, FinVolution Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.88x while Lufax Holding's PE ratio is 362.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FinVolution Group is 1.25x versus 0.65x for Lufax Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qifu Technology has a net margin of 19.69% compared to FinVolution Group's net margin of 52.32%. FinVolution Group's return on equity of 16.39% beat Qifu Technology's return on equity of 27.42%.

FinVolution Group has a consensus price target of $11.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.41%. On the other hand Qifu Technology has an analysts' consensus of $54.77 which suggests that it could grow by 23.16%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than Qifu Technology, analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than Qifu Technology.

FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.442%.

FinVolution Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Qifu Technology offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. FinVolution Group pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology pays out 20.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FinVolution Group quarterly revenues are $480.4M, which are smaller than Qifu Technology quarterly revenues of $509.1M. FinVolution Group's net income of $94.6M is lower than Qifu Technology's net income of $266.4M. Notably, FinVolution Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.88x while Qifu Technology's PE ratio is 7.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FinVolution Group is 1.25x versus 3.44x for Qifu Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of 19.69% compared to FinVolution Group's net margin of 22.6%. FinVolution Group's return on equity of 16.39% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 11.24%.

FinVolution Group has a consensus price target of $11.77, signalling upside risk potential of 36.41%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $9.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.86%. Given that FinVolution Group has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding, analysts believe FinVolution Group is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding.

FinVolution Group has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.759% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.966%.

FinVolution Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FinVolution Group pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FinVolution Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FinVolution Group quarterly revenues are $480.4M, which are larger than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $124.1M. FinVolution Group's net income of $94.6M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $28.1M. Notably, FinVolution Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.88x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FinVolution Group is 1.25x versus 3.97x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.